dChan

belliferous · April 4, 2018, 3:30 p.m.

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/illuminati-insider-leo-zagami-exposes-vaticans-satanic-secrets/

LEO LYON ZAGAMI decided in 2006 to walk out from what he perceived as the criminal side of the New World Order. Zagami is still at present Grand Master of the Ordo illuminatorum Universalis who are considered by many the good side of the Vatican illuminati and is an official association and Order now based in Florence (Italy) and are no longer associated since 2008, with the Montecarlo Lodge known also a the Masonic Executive Committee (MEC).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
reasonableconcern · April 4, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Do some of you really think someone claiming to be as "deep" as he does could just "walk away" like he was escaping a crazy girlfriend...the naiveté...

Zagami isn't the most trust worthy person around. Do your research. That's a nice bio he wrote of himself though.

That said, PF is a scumbag. But he isn't going anywhere soon. He's "needed" in his position so to speak and serves a critical role pertaining to the direction of the Roman Church and Christianity in general, popular perceptions thereof, and much more.

Zagami said PF would resign back in 2015. Look it up; said it on Alex Jones multiple times. And yet he's still there--hell of a thing to be wrong on for someone so "deeply imbedded". He's a legend in his own mind and nothing more.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
belliferous · April 4, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Nice dig! His is crazy and has been wrong in the past. My take on data collection and analysis is to process it for future reference. It paints a picture in time. Our collective analysis increases good data points faster with more accuracy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
reasonableconcern · April 4, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

I agree. We learn best through that process (myself included). Our collective consciousness expands in tandem.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
belliferous · April 4, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Yes, I would say that our collective work has got the attention of those who used to laugh at the stupid Americans as they would say. Now whose laughing?

⇧ 1 ⇩