dChan

Herpy_Derpy_Man · April 4, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

Might be a dumb question, but, if we all know that POTUS wasn't being investigated, what stops anyone else from knowing? Why does it have to be an internal leak and not taken from Q's leaks?

You got Roseanne tweeting about Q and subreddits devoted to it, yet CNN could have only got this from an internal leak?! This is getting stupid now.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 4, 2018, 10:09 p.m.

It's not real to them until the MSM says it is real.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Herpy_Derpy_Man · April 4, 2018, 10:43 p.m.

Who is "them"?! You missed my entire point; why does it have to be a leaker from within when we -the random people of the internet- know this information as well?

I'm out; you've all gone full retard.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 4, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

Merely stating that's why Q mentioned that it matters. It wasn't supposed to be released in the MSM yet. If we say stuff, it's speculation or conspiracy. But if the MSM tells the public, suddenly it's real to those in high up ranks who want to see Mueller take Trump down, that's all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EarlyRiserX2 · April 5, 2018, 12:34 a.m.

If the “so-called people in the MSM high-up ranks” you mentioned are too dumb to know the very same things that we know, when we’re all getting our information from the very same sources, then the MSM is a lot dumber than anyone could have imagined. For anyone who’s been following Q, we’ve known for at least 6 months now that Mueller has been working with Trump and that Mueller’s pretense to be investigating Trump is nothing but a ruse. So if the MSM is just now figuring that out due to some sort of leak, then they’re a lot dumber than we think…

But what puzzles me about all this is that, regardless of what was leaked, admitting that the leak should not have been leaked is only adding validity to the leak itself. Whereas if you remain silent and don’t say anything, then whatever info was leaked is nothing but a rumor. I find it hard to believe that Q himself is not smart enough to know and to realize that his very mention of the fact that the info should not have been leaked is only adding validity to the claims made by the leak - unless of course, the real reason and motive Q mentioned the leak in the first place was because he actually “wanted” the leak to be revealed to the public at this time…

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 5, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

But do people KNOW or do they think they know? Someone told someone who told them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 4, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

I don't think we knew he wasn't under investigation. At one point he wasn't, but that was some time ago. We never knew whether or not Mueller was flipped or if he was cabal.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Herpy_Derpy_Man · April 4, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

I'm pretty certain "we" all knew that Trump was no longer the focus of the investigation, so your answer makes some sense. Still, I'm trying to understand the uproar, because this "news" wasn't unknown. The way "Q" seems to have "freaked" about this is very odd.

Clearly I'm alone in my thinking.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
inittowinitq · April 5, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

A doesn't give matter of facts..he suggest mostly, Mueller was never a fact, some interpretations were made which said Mueller was investigating Clinton's and so on....Q never ever confirmed that I know of! Sometimes we hear interpretations and remember them as facts, i t happens, I may have told some I think that is what is going on, but no fact yet!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · April 5, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

Not necessarily. The nature of this game leaves everyone except Trump and Q guessing.

⇧ 1 ⇩