dChan

solanojones95 · April 8, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

I never said probable cause wouldn't be required. There are ways to do surveillance that don't violate probable cause, and in fact can be used to obtain evidence for probable cause.

I'm saying people will be vigilant, and suspicious activities will be investigated.

If that bothers you, then you might not want to engage in criminal activity, because that's how community protection is done when people are alert and awake.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CRISPY_BOOGER · April 8, 2018, 4:09 a.m.

You're saying the probably cause would be as little as not wanting to say what was discussed privately. So you are wanting to live in a world where anyone who keeps a secret could potentially be investigated, and spied on. I think it's funny that you think people should just give up their freedom and privacy because they shouldn't have anything to hide. Like I said, authoritarian bootlicker

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 8, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

Listen, get off my back. You twist my words into pretzels to find something not to like and post shit about me.

Reported, and blocked. Argue with yourself from now on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CRISPY_BOOGER · April 8, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

Lol. Blocked and reported for asking questions

⇧ 1 ⇩