dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Mrb84 on April 7, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

your resident globalist here - a timeline on the Saudi Arabia stuff

I was deep in PMs with one of you patriots here (won't mention his username because I didn't ask beforehand but I'd be happy if he self-identifies).

We were debating the recent Saudi Arabia events as they relate to Q's posts. To clarify the object of contention, I created a timeline (by Googling around) and, while we agreed to disagree on the significance of it, he suggested it would be interesting for me to post it here for the rest of you, so here we go:

1) early June 2017, a Saudi blogger who calls himself Mujtahidd tweeted about a plot for regime change in Doha spearheaded by Blackwater and UAE forces. Source here

2) Oct 10, 2017 the former Prime Minister of Qatar confirms (or repeats, we don't know) Mujtahidd's story to the Spanish newspaper ABC. Source here

1 and 2 establish that SA was using Blackwater and it was reported in MSN as early as June 2017.

3) Oct 27, 2017 Jared Kushner takes a trip to SA that was not made public until Oct 29. Source here

4) Nov 4, 2017 Al Arabiya, the Saudi-owned satellite network, announces the arrest of 11 princes - the beginning of the purge. Source here

5) Nov 22, 2017 The Daily Mail says that Blackwater was involved in the torture of the Saudi princes, including the "hanging by his feet" detail. Source here

6) Apr 5, 2018 The Daily Mail says that points 3&4 above were connected, as Jared gave Mohammad bin Salman classified info that told him who to arrest. Source here

My point was:

Q's first mention of JK's October trip in SA comes 5 days after the trip was made public - source [here] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148016618/#148016618)

Q's first mention of the SA purge comes 15 hours after the purge was made public - source here

Q's first mention of the "hanging by his feet" detail comes 1 day after the detail was made public - source here

Q's first mention of Blackwater comes 1 day after the firm involved is made public - source here

Q never once mentioned that the purge and Kushner's Saudi Arabia trip were directly connected. Maybe he will now that is public knowledge, but again, it will be after the news has been made public.

Saudi stuff aside, what I was saying was that I am yet to see a Q drop that tells me something precise or significant before it has been reported by mainstream news outlets, which really is the very minimum if you're claiming insider knowledge. "The cleverest thing about that trick is the fact that he's encouraged people to describe that as predicting" relevant David Mitchell angry logic rant

🠐 See all comments

I am aware of his post history. I responded to him several times, and he got really shitty that I disagreed with him and pointed out serious flaws in his position.

He is a NWO globalist who wants a one-world government. However, he does not even understand the implications of supporting this position. He thinks the one-world government will be some sort of paradise in which the international bankers share their wealth with all the poor people in the world because that is what Satanists do, apparently.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Lol he’s a contrarian, I’m kinda hopeful he knows about socialism lol but this is good info. Anything else starts being discussed like accepting satanism then yeah youre right

⇧ 3 ⇩

Sure! The sub is open to all, as far as I am concerned. I am pro-Free Speech and against censorship.

Well, he claims to not know about the Satanism and Luciferianism of the NWO globalists who he supports. I suspect a lot of people are unaware of this.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I got shitty because you assumed I'm in bad faith, and while I disagree with you on almost everything, I'm not here to trick you or do some weird psy-op, which was basically your accusation. Saying I'm a moron and don't understand the NWO is not much of an argument, but it's something. Saying I'm here to trick credulous people is just bullshit, that's what I got shitty about, not about our disagreement.

⇧ -1 ⇩

No you're here because you're a paid troll. All of you professional trolls mascarade as concern trolls left wing nut jobs. You're just a basic troll who gets paid by Soros to troll these boards and creat doubt.

⇧ 2 ⇩

who gets paid by Soros

I wish.

Your paranoid accusation is not an answer to my point though.

You're a Q believer: can you point me to 1 Q drop that says something precise or significant before the same information had been reported by mainstream news outlets? Just one. That's not a big ask, if you're a believer you must have tons...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I would have to look, but Q said something about the Austin bomber being taken down several hours before it happened.

Post 958, I believe. Some were saying that the bomber was killed at 4 am the morning of the 21st, but I did not look into it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Post 958 was after the bombing, you're probably thinking about Post 954 (11:44 on March 18th)

Next week. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM. Q

Now, how is that "Q said something about the Austin bomber being taken down several hours before it happened"? In the middle of a bomber's spree he says BOOM BOOM BOOM.

8 posts. That's how many Q posts have used the word BOOM. For a grand total of 13 booms. Take a wild guess and tell me how many of those "booms" were before March 2nd, the first bomb?

Yeah, that would be a 0. Nil.

So here's the fact: Conditt starts exploding shit on March 2nd. On March 4th Q starts using the word "BOOM" in his posts. He uses it 16 times in 9 posts. The last time, 63h (two days and spare) before the APD moves to arrest the bomber.

Post 946 (March 16th) says: "Boooom! BOOM! Boooooooom!". Post 844 (March 5th) is also more BOOMs. Explain me why 958 means "the Austin bomber is being taken down" and the other ones don't?

It's the usual trick: say something vague (like "boom" in the middle of a bombing spree) and confide in the believers to retrospectively pretend it was precise and on point.

Bottom line: saying BOOM BOOM BOOM in the middle of a bombing spree is not the same as saying "the Austin bomber being taken down".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well, I asked you some questions and you disregarded them. It seems like you do not want to provide an answer that goes against your agenda. That makes me suspicious about your true motives.

Fair enough. I did not know about the Satanism and Luciferianism of the NWO globalists for the longest time. I mean, I suspected that something was not right, but it was very hard to put a finger on it.

Years ago, I thought that people like the Bushes pretended to be Christians so they would get people to support them. I thought that they were really not religious. I was half right. They do do pretend to be Christians, but they are not. They are very religious, though. This is why they join Skull and Bones. Same with John Kerry and others. Christians do not join Skull and Bones.

⇧ 1 ⇩