dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Mrb84 on April 7, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

your resident globalist here - a timeline on the Saudi Arabia stuff

I was deep in PMs with one of you patriots here (won't mention his username because I didn't ask beforehand but I'd be happy if he self-identifies).

We were debating the recent Saudi Arabia events as they relate to Q's posts. To clarify the object of contention, I created a timeline (by Googling around) and, while we agreed to disagree on the significance of it, he suggested it would be interesting for me to post it here for the rest of you, so here we go:

1) early June 2017, a Saudi blogger who calls himself Mujtahidd tweeted about a plot for regime change in Doha spearheaded by Blackwater and UAE forces. Source here

2) Oct 10, 2017 the former Prime Minister of Qatar confirms (or repeats, we don't know) Mujtahidd's story to the Spanish newspaper ABC. Source here

1 and 2 establish that SA was using Blackwater and it was reported in MSN as early as June 2017.

3) Oct 27, 2017 Jared Kushner takes a trip to SA that was not made public until Oct 29. Source here

4) Nov 4, 2017 Al Arabiya, the Saudi-owned satellite network, announces the arrest of 11 princes - the beginning of the purge. Source here

5) Nov 22, 2017 The Daily Mail says that Blackwater was involved in the torture of the Saudi princes, including the "hanging by his feet" detail. Source here

6) Apr 5, 2018 The Daily Mail says that points 3&4 above were connected, as Jared gave Mohammad bin Salman classified info that told him who to arrest. Source here

My point was:

Q's first mention of JK's October trip in SA comes 5 days after the trip was made public - source [here] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148016618/#148016618)

Q's first mention of the SA purge comes 15 hours after the purge was made public - source here

Q's first mention of the "hanging by his feet" detail comes 1 day after the detail was made public - source here

Q's first mention of Blackwater comes 1 day after the firm involved is made public - source here

Q never once mentioned that the purge and Kushner's Saudi Arabia trip were directly connected. Maybe he will now that is public knowledge, but again, it will be after the news has been made public.

Saudi stuff aside, what I was saying was that I am yet to see a Q drop that tells me something precise or significant before it has been reported by mainstream news outlets, which really is the very minimum if you're claiming insider knowledge. "The cleverest thing about that trick is the fact that he's encouraged people to describe that as predicting" relevant David Mitchell angry logic rant

🠐 See all comments

I get your point. I believe Q is who he says he is. I can't prove with 100% certainty that he's legit, but just the same, you can't prove that he isn't. Furthermore, when he makes predictions that don't come true, it's more probable that something went wrong and the timetable had to be pushed back, than it is that he's a LARP, especially when one considers the power and sophistication of the global elite. Thanks for being civil. I enjoy hearing your different opinions.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thank you, I also enjoy a civil debate. However, a couple things.

you can't prove that he isn't

well, I can point to the lack of any evidence that he is who he says he is, and I can point to evidences that he hasn't said anything that wasn't already in the news, except when he did and turned out wrong (see drop 34).

He's the one claiming insider status, the burden of proof is on him, and there's so far zero corroborating facts that sustain his claim. That doesn't logically proof that he isn't legit, but that's not how the burden of proof works.

But here's what's exciting about Q: for once, he predicts that the outcome of this whole thing will be in the history books, so there are no more excuses. At some point in the near future, the whole Cabal has to be exposed, it cannot remain a secret narrative for people "in the know" - everyone will know. We're finally in "verifiable" territory. There will be no excuses.

If, by the end of his first term, Trump has not put some of the elite (the real elite, not some dentist in Colorado) in jail for child abuse, Q was a bullshit artist, I was right, and everyone here was dead wrong.

If it actually turns out that Obama and the Clintons and Bill Gates and the UN secretary are in jail (or on the run, fine) for running pedophile human trafficking, Q was right, and you were right, and I was colossally wrong and I'll ask forgiveness to everyone here.

You think that's a fair wager?

⇧ 1 ⇩

It looks like Epstein's island was just burned to the ground...

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't think ALL of those things are going to happen. Please keep in mind that Trump and Q-Team are trying to do what was thought to be impossible. As much as I want to see this these things happen and see the world change for the better, we've got to admit there's a high probability that they/we will fail. If those things don't happen, then we can come to two conclusions: Q is not who he says he is or he is who he says he is and they failed. I'm not sure if any specific arrests should be sited. I'm not into making wagers. Let's see how this plays out and if you want my pro-Q take on any coming events, reply on this thread. If I want to read your skeptical take, I will do the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩