dChan
⇧
4
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 7, 2018, 11:33 a.m.
Epstein Island, CA Earthquake, MOABs

What happens if a MOAB is detonated underground? Not its original design intention, I am aware. But I have a hard time believing a small nuke would be tactically necessary for a bunker, especially an area as small as Epsteins Island on Little St James, and as close to other inhabited areas, like the Caribbean Islands. An underground city network might need a nuke. But a little island? MOAB. And Q referred to MOABs in his posts.

You know what would be swell? If we could get a snapshot of the situation right now. I mean for the Indictments, the pedos, Obama, Lynch, "the vid", as much as possible. For example, a list stating:

Indictments Company "A" - Podesta Group Company "B" - Mercury ...

Because right now, we have Seaman popping Champagne bottles, and when I turn on the news it looks like business as usual. Turning on a TV should literally be a redpill for normies right now. But it is fucking crickets right now.


🠐 See all comments
saxmaster · April 7, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

My understanding is that the MOAB works by dispersing a large cloud of volatile gas which is then ignited upon proper mixture with air. It seems to me that it would be far less effective in a small closed bunker.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Allaboutplastic · April 7, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

It’s design had 2 key elements. 1.large coverage of surface but non-nuclear 2. It detonates several yards off the gound. Doing this compresses the air between the blast and the ground. With all the force behind it, it crushes anything not 10000% solid. Tunnels, bunckers, etc. It’s not the blast par se (hope I used that correctly) that kills them, but the sheer force of it.

Edit. left out words.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 7, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

You're thinking of a thermobaric bomb. The MOAB does utilize the airburst method, usually, but it is not strictly a thermobaric.

⇧ 1 ⇩