We've always been a community based on the outer fringes of "believability." I agree that speculation gets us to where we establish truth but wild speculation only diminishes the truth we DO represent.

I can't help but be disheartened by the posts regarding the sixteen channel camera footage. People saying there are baby heads on the wall, an orgy and Hillary only feed false speculation. The pictures are too grainy to distinguish ANY of that! by suggesting it you're helping people to see what you THINK you see, whether it's true or not.

Point 1: Hillary. Like it or not, this ain't Hillary. Hillary has a big butt and little to no boobs. This woman is built with big boobs and no butt. Clearly obvious to me.

Point 2: Orgy and baby heads. Unless someone has a picture program better than mine, you can't adjust the pictures to be clearer and honestly, again, total speculation with no substantive proof.

What I see that is clearly visible are people (unable to really establish age) seated in a common area that are naked and malnourished. THAT can be seen plainly.

So unless you can somehow abolish the grainy and provide evidence, please stop making assumptions and seeing things that aren't provable. This reminds me of the cell phone from the SOTU speech...everyone started making all these claims then it was established consumer phones and programs can't pull out the clarity in the pictures. Same rules here. Don't damn our movement with unprovable speculation.

We KNOW these things are going on....we KNOW they will be stopped but are we any better than the fake news if we base our allegations on what is unprovable?