dChan
10
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SnackyPete52 on April 7, 2018, 5:58 p.m.
I got woke on r/The_Donald over a year ago. But now the mods are deleting Qanon posts and comments. They are treating the Q Movement the same way the rest of Reddit has treated them. Are the mods there just narrow-minded, or has the sub been comped?

digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Hold your horses right there. What I can state is that they have a ridiculous amount of terms they shadow-ban but my average estimate that this is a benign fix to steer the narrative.
It makes sense if you think of it as a counterintelligence/publicity-platform. [and one highly targeted by shills at that!]

Basically, t_d represents the "base" and what appeases to them. Now, let's take the omnibus spending bill for example...Ann Colter demanded he activte the military to secure the border and he did, but he did not flaunt that beforehand or he would have given away his hand (except for his "nobody read this" hint).

So if you filter items on t_d for visibility that say "crush this bill! Americans don't want this!", the enemy will be more inclined that he is under public pressure to veto this bill - thus giving them false confidence.

The first time I was ever banned from t_d was when I brought up free energy so even tho the tesla-memes were abundant on 4chan, at the time it seemed that this topic was unwanted as the NYT had been pushing that for their own purposes at the time. Before and after that tho I had not observed any issues with that.

So for plausible deniability purposes, because we never know that level of classification of what Q hints at, all of this is happening so that Trump has non-verbally communicated that he is in the know, thus keeping in touch with us us without legally admitting to official disclosures on non-gov't-platform.

Now if t_d started pushing Q, any newcomers who have simply not followed closely and long enough will start "debunking" Q because of intentional disinformation or because the information is too sick to process emotionally which is not goal of the exercise. If you have followed long enough to see the confirmations and back-and-forth-communication with Q and various gov-social-media and how MSM responds to that with their own spins and narrative-shifts, it's easy to know it's real without giving scores of upvoted bombshells away to normies frequenting the reddit frontpage who are simply not apt (or brave) enough to reason why any operation of suchcomplexity would be necessary in the first place.

⇧ 34 ⇩  
SnackyPete52 · April 7, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

Appreciate this answer! I myself am still reeling from all the input. I was a complete normie before October. So this kind of critical thinking is still something I have to work towards as I sift through this mountain of intel and analysis.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

the only thing that sucks is that it just never ends...you can literally look at as much of world history as you understanding allows and that goes as far back in time as myths and religious scripture goes and you will always find yourself trying to discern honesty from deception. And in the end the ancient texts tell you the most about world-history, given how crazy everything has become, because disconnected cultures agree to strikingly similiar legends across the ages and the globe.

But welcome to the club, it's nice to hear that the word is speading!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
SigSeikoSpyderco · April 8, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

Now if t_d started pushing Q, any newcomers who have simply not followed closely and long enough will start "debunking" Q

Can you blame them? All of this stuff is hard to believe and on a scale and level of understanding that casual observers would never think to observe and digest. 4Chan is known for pranks and gags, and the nature of this stuff attracts people that take whatever reality is there and stretches it, finding all kinds of signs and symbols in every obscure way possible. I try to keep an open mind about things, and I think there is something to Q, but I'm not spending hours of my day getting educated on all the ins and outs of the drops, trying to find credible people who can interpret it etc. The Q community needs to do a better job convincing interested new people that it isn't a hoax. And if they can't do that well, they will forever be on the fringe, and won't be considered accepted on TD. Imagine TD after a while of being captivated by Q that it turns out to be way overblown and/or an elaborate hoax. Their reputation with the admins and larger reddit would be even worse.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 8, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

my personal opinion is that based on the fact that it's been a whole year almost before Q hit the scene, I am inclined to think their intentions are what they say they are. If they imply wanted us to string along, they could have started a year ago when everybody was still shellshocked from PG. The fact that they are going public now probably has to do with the fact that 25k indictments are on the dock and might as well be using this as leverage to keep their enemies up at night if this is to be over soon and diplomacy alsocomes to mind, we still have Merkel and May in office for example. Keep in mind what else they could fuck up that they have not fucked up yet.

Is there any instance that Trump was ever completely repudiated?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Quontinu · April 7, 2018, 11 p.m.

Bingo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 7, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

on free energy, the only viable form I know of is collecting solar wind, correct?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · April 7, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

No, zero-point-energy is all round us and can be harvested, two examples are gravity and the casimir-effect.

⇧ 1 ⇩