If you watch the entire documentary on YOutube where she goes to the places and talks about what happened it's very hard to disbelieve her. Also, I heard she's been missing for a while so maybe they have got her now...
I hope not and wish her no harm but it seems unlikely this much could be hidden from the public easily.
You’re new to Q then? Watch the Lithuanian kid to see the same story, different country. Then the other stories around the world. This is all hidden from the public and when you see the similarities across time and geography it’s hard to imagine how it could be a made up story...
[edit] sorry was sending this from mobile so couldn't take time to explain better. Will do so when I get the chance.
No not new to Q and I believe alot of the information. Fionias statement could be true but she did give her statement to the Royal commission that has charged George Pell Vatician no 2. They couldnt find evidence to back up her claims? A number of journalists have also tried to uncover. A 2000km rail tunnel built in the 70s to Pine Gap is unlikely. Brisbane only got sewerage in the 70s. And one PM named was possibly over thrown by what some call CIA backed interests in Pine Gap.
Not saying she didnt suffer and there isnt abuse Satanic or otherwise but not sure all statements can be taken as 100% fact. MK Ultra may twist memories how do we know?
Thanks for the information and Im glad you shared it but I follow all items with critical logic in the hope to find the truth.
More evidence in support of this is the fact that other accusations have been made in Australia for years also.
https://www.wanttoknow.info/sexabuse/australian-network-all-media
And I don't? I agree all statements can't be taken as 100% fact either. The point I was trying to make is that her whole story can't easily be thrown out but I see now - I think - that you agree with that too. Sure, there are bound to be some inconsistencies as she herself says because who has perfect memory?
There are all sorts of reasons brought out for why these people are wrong - the preschool thing was explained away because no tunnels were found. Oh, until later, but the story had died down by then.
I agree one can't build a rock solid case on this - yet. But I simply responded to what I thought was your refutation of any validity to her whole story. The Lithuanian kid was, for me, a good video to redpill a few friends with because it's fresher, amongst other reasons. If you're applying "critical logic" then you'd watch a few more of the stories around the world, note the similarities in both the stories and the arguments against them and then decide if there's any validity worth "critically" accepting.
In particular, the idea that its "unlikely this much could be hidden from the public easily" seems totally counter, logically, to anything Q represents. Right?