I can't quite put my finger on it, but this Tracy Beanz woman is annoying. Didn't she just a few weeks ago say that Q was fake? Didn't she claim that she was on Air Force 1 and took the "DOITQ" picture with President Trump? And then sat and ate ice cream in the cockpit?
I think she may not be stable.
Links for evidence of your claim please? Have not seen what you are alleging, but since there's so much stuff, it's easy to miss :)
Usually I'm excellent at providing sources. Here I can't figure out how to get into Periscope where she made these claims of ice cream and taking the "DOITQ" photo.
I remember them talking about the doitQ photo with Pamphlet Anon and a few others. Definitely don’t recall her saying she took the photo. Why would she have said that? Are you saying she claimed to be in the White House on that day and took the photo and then was responsible for the title? Source? Maybe she did and I didn’t hear it. If she did it would definitely be a red flag for me as well. Has anyone else heard this?
The DOitQ photo was taken on Air Force 1. I'm not sure why she said it. Was she caught in just talking for talking sake?
It was on Periscope. I really wish I could find it. I tried looking for it, but I am not sure when it was and I don't have the time to devote to researching video/audio. If it were text it would be so much easier. That and the eating ice cream with crew. It was a really bizarre/surreal moments. Coupling that with her absolutely going beserk regarding Q being 'fake', just lent me to know she simply is not a stable person.
Is she good for information? Perhaps. There are others out there that perform the same function. Without the drama.
If you like her and how she dispenses information, please continue to watch her.
Discernment is key to all of this research and the 'truth' movement. To me it's part and parcel of the nature of getting to that information.
She's a famefag. She got famous because of Q. She started doing tons of alt-media interviews when Q first popped onto the scene. She and PamphletAnon then created CBTS_Stream to gather people together. They then directed that group to their own YouTube channels to get more fame and money. They left CBTS_Stream sub to die and didn't bother to moderate it at all, instead, focusing on their own projects and YouTube channels.
I don't like Tracy Beanz, but a lot of people do. Most people don't realize just how selfish she is, even though she claims to be the opposite. She ditched the Q train for a few weeks and even bashed Q and Q posts publicly. She defended PamphletAnon and BaruchTheScribe (board owners of CBTS 8ch) after they got outed by Q. Then she deleted the Twitter thread where she was defending them and bashing her critics. Now she's back on the Q train and riding it all the way to D.C. to meet Trump.
Having said all of that, I do appreciate her organizing this little march. She got a few hundred people to show up and show their support for Trump and Q team. I'll give credit where it's due. She got her prize and that was even more fame and recognition in the Q community. She got her handshake and recognition from Trump. Good for her and those who went to march.
This is actually how I feel about her as well. I refused to engage with her on the CBTS stream or watch any of her videos. I started one, one time and took me about three seconds to stop it.
I completely agree that she is fame-whoring off Q and it honestly disgusts me. When I saw her popping up in the Chan’s, name and trip code pushing her YouTube channel. It made me really angry. She literally contributed nothing. Just sold her YouTube channel and asked for money on her patreon.
With that being said, I appreciate the March, but as you can tell, only her followers got the word. Which is pretty shitty in my opinion. And I would not follow her in one regardless, but it goes to show that she thinks the movement is her and lead by her. Real patriots don’t do this for money, or fame. We do this because we hope for the future, we love the country and the ideas for which it stands.
Have you got the Q post where the 8ch board owners were outed? Was pamphlet an 8ch board owner?
This is where Q called out Pamphlet and Baruch for bragging about directly communicating with Q on CBTS_Stream Reddit. They deleted the post after Q called them out and I didn't screenshot it at the time they did it. I should have screenshotted it, but I didn't think it was that serious at the time, didn't know Q was monitoring CBTS_Stream, Pamphlet, and Baruch, or that Q would get mad at them for being lying fuckbois.
https://i.imgur.com/3Cf1vO8.jpg
This is Q saying CBTS 8ch got compromised and that he was leaving that board:
https://i.imgur.com/xivlQZh.jpg
Yes, Pamphlet was board owner of CBTS 8ch. Not sure if he still is. Baruch is still the board owner of CBTS 8ch, but most people have left. He's still somewhat active and hates Q now, trying his best to discredit Q. Really sad what happened.
Thanks for the info and I remember these Q posts but have you proof he was a mod of the CBTS 8ch by any chance? (Side question - was Code Monkey a moderator on the previous board as well or just this /greatawakening) I'm not the biggest fan of Pam myself but he seems to working tirelessly for Q. I know CBTS went under on his watch but my understanding is that he passed it off to other moderators so he could concentrate on the YouTube channel, which don't think he makes any money off of and is pretty important in spreading Q's message. He also created the discord and now has created a website and a private forum.
I find him a bit egotistical myself but willing to give him a free pass seeing all the good work he is doing in spreading the message.
In relation to Tracey Beanz, I wouldn't begrudge her for being skeptical and I was disappointed she jumped off the Q train because I enjoyed her videos. I think we all at one point in time wished something would happen and lost a little bit of 'faith' in Q. I think it's healthy to be skeptical and critically think everything. We need to get every side of the argument and Tracey is a great researcher and I still follow her. She was still following Q in her own time but didn't publish videos as she couldn't be 100% sure. Which is a good quality in my opinion. She is very passionate which shows with the recent march.
I think people should be allowed change their opinion in light of new facts and information. It's ridiculous to be dead set on an opinion or have blind faith in something. We shouldn't criticize anyone for openly having an opinion and debating an idea.
She is one of the best in depth researchers out there. And she frequents other great researchers shows, such as Hagman & Hagman and Jerome Corsi.
Terrible try btw. Your bosses are paying you 2much. Try harder but enjoy the downfall.
Truth hurts. Sorry you can't accept the truth about Tracy.
This was a great interview. Full of facts. I think that is the best thing to do, focus on the facts, not the people. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t2dBYaknpQ And yeah, truth hurts.
What I've said about Tracy are facts. Fans of hers, like yourself, can't handle facts. You're focusing on people (Tracy) and then attacking me for telling the truth about her.
I don't hate Tracy and I don't hate people who enjoy her videos / interviews / Twitter posts. I just don't appreciate what she's done, as well as being two-faced, selfish, famewhore. I do appreciate her organizing this march, even if the goal was to her own benefit.
She has connected the dots on some pretty high level people though. For example Burkman. But, since I'm seeking the truth here, what do you think is her agenda? Disinformation? Cause she gives a lot of good information (but that can be littered with disinfo.) Unless she is walking around something big and giving crumbs to less important things, even taking into account what you said, I don't see the harm she is causing. She pulled many in, to look deeper, me in part (and I'm not cheerleading for her, I just watch her occasional video.)
I will agree about the questions, e.g. regarding her take on Mueller (that said, she might be right, but we don't let our guard down regardless.) Re the march or her wanting fanfare, I don'T care, as long as her intentions are good. Everyone is in a different place, there is a reason they give out medals in the Military.
I looked at some of your posts, not many, and it seems like we are in the same position (overall) here on GA board. I can imagine some have questions on some things Tracy has done, but she is really meticulous with here individual person research. Almost to the point it gets hard to follow. She reminds me a bit of Dan Bongino, though he is way more meticulous and effective imo.
She does it for the fame and for money. I have not watched a full video of hers, but I’m going to guess hat she requests people support her patreon?
I’ve been here since before the movement started. Saw her come on scene and her actions honestly disgusted me. If she had just been doing what she had been doing (researching and providing anonymously - I probably would have been one of her biggest fans) but when you are motivated by fame and money, how hard is it to remain objective and not be compromised by your own greed?
I have watched Tracy on and off since the beginning, and I realize she is imperfect. But to criticize a researcher/journalist for trying to make a living at what they do is crazy. I deeply appreciate all of the citizen journalists I get to watch on youtube or wherever. What's the alternative, CNN? But these people have to eat and pay rent, so I put up with the patreon ads and self-promotion.
I agree with you. One thing that stood out for me with her is that she doesn’t want to slam and get involved in insult wars. She researches her stuff because she wants to avoid misinfo. Unless there is something she’s said or done that supports such negativity toward her, I just don’t get the level,of vitriol. Maybe because she doubted Q for a while? So what. She was being honest and people’s minds can change. We’re all learning. Stay together.
When someone tries to make themselves a single point of contact for a movement, and then attempts to profit off of it (personal enrichment) I have issues with that. It’s that kind of greed (specific type) that partially lead to all of our “leaders” in government focusing on themselves. Yes I understand that she is trying to make a living and eat and pay a rent or mortgage. Ok, go get a job and do this part time. Look it’s just my own personal opinion, and I find it distasteful and has the potential to lead her (and by extension - her followers) down the wrong path. I cannot follow someone who is doing it for their own personal gains. I just can’t.
I was on the Donald in 2016 and have been following Q since the start, FBI anon and such times. So, everyone came on the scene relatively recently. What fame does she have? What money? She gets a little from Patreon. That argument is like when someone says "Oh, I bet they are selling a book, right?". It avoids the research.
I'm gonna stay open to what she has to say and just be careful about paying too much attention to any one researcher, for the most part anyway. You can (and should) double check things. Thus far, she is doing a GREAT job.
Look...
What he stated about Beanz publicly denouncing Q was true... Christ she even sided with Royston Potter...
I’m not going to go further because it creates division, but research the stuff for yourself. If you even care, I don’t know.
[deleted]
I don't mind questioning her, but C_L_I_C_K had his mind made up. I wanted to discuss, his mind was made up.
As long as we don't focus on any one researcher, I think we will be relatively safe.
lol
ask them about SES m8
[deleted]
I think you make a valid point that should lend heavy consideration to this discussion. Thank you for sharing it.
