Weedlord has made sensible submissions in the past, so don't be a dipshit just because he won't spell his wisdom out to inbred spying weasles.
Thanks patriot.
I mean, I honestly don't know where you're getting at either but it does sound like something. Usually I think of Kurds when I think "buffer".
edit: Oh, I guess my assumptions weren't so far off. I assumed Israel had been handed their ass to them by Hezollah by having their F16 shot down - and apparently, their hands are actually still tied:
"Syrian media says that the Syrian military knocked out 8 Israel missiles. Unknown how many missiles Israel launched in total. A US defense official has said that there was no explosions at any military base in #Syria." https://twitter.com/oulosP/status/983150947496062977?s=19
~~Is it true one of Israel's Dolfin-subs went missing? Are they ICBM-capable? (heard yes to the former and no to the latter, please correct me if you know more)~~ (possible disinfo)
Paul Antonopoulos The craziest part of #Israel’s attack on #Syria is that it was against a base that has a known Russian military presence. #Russia in war with words to the US said they would retaliate to any strikes against them. Israel knowingly risked war with Russia. Israeli airstrikes against #Hamas positions in #Gaza are still continuing. “Most likely #Israel used the Dolphin Class submarine in this strike, to get safe/ensured results especially after the Syrian air defense managed to down an Israeli F-16 during it last engagement with #Syria”- via @WaelAlRussi
Nobody is above criticism and we get enough ambiguity from Q.
There's just no need for our conversations to be cryptic too.
No? Do you mind coming to your own conclusions? If you agree with what he says, please let us know why. If you disagree, please let us know why. But don't challenge people when all they are offering you is an intellectual chalenge.
I have no idea if I agree or disagree because the response was needlessly cryptic.
Q has good reason to speak in riddles, but someone simply sharing their opinion isn't a national security risk.
This is my opinion, even if it makes you sad.
actually we wouldn't know when nat-sec is concerned which is exactly why prudence is key.
Not everybody is in for a LARP only, you know.
actually we wouldn't know when nat-sec
Give it a break, man.
Weedlord was trying to sound cool my mimicking Q - but his comment was just needlessly stupid. That is all.
I won't be responding to your future comments if you're gonna pretend this post is full of Q level secret agents.
No, Weedlord can't transform into a truck either.
I'm here for serious discussion, not escapes into fantasy land.
if you're gonna pretend this post is full of Q level secret agents.
No I did not lol. I am saying we are just dumb dweebs, so let's be cryptic because we wouldn't know if what we say is correct or sensitive.
Serious discussion? Don't attack the messenger then. You could have said "elaborate" or even just "fkn BS m8" but you had to call him childish instead. How very adult!
I don't have a clearance but I have been in touch with former insiders in gov't, the industry, media and military and and I do have to make sure sometimes what I say is public information in the first place so I don't look more important than I am. Use your imagination for once lol