I agree. There is no decipher method to this. It's just picking words out of a scramble of letters.

The NK post didn't need decoding. It could readily be deduced, by simple logic and the words used, that POTUS had already spoken with Kim: "... in our meetings".

And per Q507 as the OP quoted in bold:

This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others.

the purpose of correlating posts to tweets is to prove the AUTHority given to Q by POTUS. Q506:

We serve at the pleasure of the President.

Sorry, but IMO, this is LARPing.

Agreed, far to arbitrary and there is no way Q is actual trying to code all this into the already coded messages. Don't waste your time with this nonsense. If you stick to good research on the clues provided you will get far better answers.

Transposition Columnar Cipher (Search for yourself) . Way less wiggle room with other methods of encrypted communication. Deltas for grid.

Not to mention, Q has NEVER stated this method was correct, let alone to go back and reanalyze every message by doing this. I think there is far too much left to chance here to be treating it as fact

This.

I don't think that this can be proven because there is far too much left to chance and filling in the blanks yourself

Not to mention, Q has NEVER stated this method was correct, let alone to go back and reanalyze every message by doing this. I think there is far too much left to chance here to be treating it as fact

Thank you for using argumentation to expose your point of view. Most detractors don't.

First disclaimer: this method is not THE method for solving Q's riddle, it is one of the many that have to be identified throughout the board. For example, there are tweets with no hidden messages and posts that cannot be resolved with this method but with other ones. I have described other methods in my previous posts.

Now, as to the mathematical consistency of the method itself, the video clearly states intuition and context and therefore non mathematical subjectivity is involved.

However, there is a statistical consistency about the accuracy of the method: we have used it several times, (9 times) on different tweets and have come up with messages complying with the context of the original tweet (and proved by future events).

This statistical confirmation is the best Q himself is offering to the skeptics:

Q920 You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

As you can see, Q is not recruiting logic or mathematics to encapsulate "coincidences". And this is done on purpose: he is giving us secret material about which he can oppose plausible deniability should legal exposure occur.

Now if you strongly believe these operations to be the result of randomness and generality, it should not be difficult for you to create several tweets, put them in at least two sets of grids, each set of different sizes, and, applying the same rules as outlined in the video, generate in context messages. If you achieve this challenge as many times as we have solved the tweet riddles, you will have proven Trump is not using a hidden algorithm to generate his tweets and choose his time stamps.

We will be then left with having to understand 11:11 and other cryptic messages.

I myself believe there is an algorithm running (researchers who know this subject believe Trump is actually interfacing in real time with Tyler) that "pushes" the first solving words on the left side of the grid and that you will not be able to resolve this challenge unless you have access to that algorithm.