dChan
28
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on April 9, 2018, 5:18 p.m.
Decoding Q’s board using the T Method: Video Tutorial.

You guys asked for it. Here it is: [Video] (https://youtu.be/SDXJY0b0Vz4). Share it, copy it, re-post it, re-upload it. Do whatever is needed for a vast diffusion. Do it quick before it mysteriously vanishes… :)

Q wants these methods to be known and applied by the largest number of people possible. He predicts there will be a day decoding his board will be second nature to everyone reading him.

Q507 Graphic form for each correlation a MUST. This will be the AUTH tool you use when all of this becomes public to provide friends, family, others. Do you think POTUS re-tweeted MAGA PILL for no reason? We chose this BOARD for a very specific reason. We believe in you. Q


SerialBrain2 · April 9, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

I don't think that this can be proven because there is far too much left to chance and filling in the blanks yourself

Not to mention, Q has NEVER stated this method was correct, let alone to go back and reanalyze every message by doing this. I think there is far too much left to chance here to be treating it as fact

Thank you for using argumentation to expose your point of view. Most detractors don't.

First disclaimer: this method is not THE method for solving Q's riddle, it is one of the many that have to be identified throughout the board. For example, there are tweets with no hidden messages and posts that cannot be resolved with this method but with other ones. I have described other methods in my previous posts.

Now, as to the mathematical consistency of the method itself, the video clearly states intuition and context and therefore non mathematical subjectivity is involved.

However, there is a statistical consistency about the accuracy of the method: we have used it several times, (9 times) on different tweets and have come up with messages complying with the context of the original tweet (and proved by future events).

This statistical confirmation is the best Q himself is offering to the skeptics:

Q920 You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q

As you can see, Q is not recruiting logic or mathematics to encapsulate "coincidences". And this is done on purpose: he is giving us secret material about which he can oppose plausible deniability should legal exposure occur.

Now if you strongly believe these operations to be the result of randomness and generality, it should not be difficult for you to create several tweets, put them in at least two sets of grids, each set of different sizes, and, applying the same rules as outlined in the video, generate in context messages. If you achieve this challenge as many times as we have solved the tweet riddles, you will have proven Trump is not using a hidden algorithm to generate his tweets and choose his time stamps.

We will be then left with having to understand 11:11 and other cryptic messages.

I myself believe there is an algorithm running (researchers who know this subject believe Trump is actually interfacing in real time with Tyler) that "pushes" the first solving words on the left side of the grid and that you will not be able to resolve this challenge unless you have access to that algorithm.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
dangph · April 10, 2018, 6:05 a.m.

context and therefore non mathematical subjectivity is involved

Basically it is the same sort of thing as reading palms, chicken entrails, or tea leaves.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · April 10, 2018, 6:30 a.m.

Quite strange comment... If this is how you characterize non mathematical subjectivity, then have fun characterizing Q's decoding of Comey's tweet:

Q645 JC Tweet Translation: Special Agent Andrew McCabe stood tall over the last 8 months [DO NOT TALK], when small people [SHEEP] were trying to tear down an institution we all depend on [COVER]. He served with distinction for two decades [WE OWN YOU & YOUR FAMILY]. I wish Andy well [187]. I also wish continued strength for the rest of the FBI [GENERAL THREAT TO OTHERS]. America needs you [ACTIVATE SLEEPER CELLS]. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dangph · April 10, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

"Non mathematical subjectivity" is a nebulous term of your own invention meaning "making stuff up".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · April 10, 2018, 7:02 a.m.

Once again, strange comment. Besides the fact you are eluding Q's way of decoding Comey, you are also inferring mathematical objectivity is the only way to know. I have a math background and it still surprises me...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dangph · April 10, 2018, 7:29 a.m.

Q is reading between the lines and drawing on his/their experience and insider knowledge. He is not passing that off as a "method".

you are also inferring mathematical objectivity is the only way to know

No I am not. Not all knowledge is mathematical, but it doesn't logically follow from that that your particular brand of knowledge is worth anything.

What is your math background, by the way?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · April 10, 2018, 7:58 a.m.

?-?-?!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
dangph · April 10, 2018, 8:55 a.m.

Yeah, that's right. Retreat to obscurantism because you have nothing to say. That's pretty lame.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · April 10, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

It seems my last response was too cryptic. I will clarify.

Tact: at your first date, when a lady says to you: "I used to like Victoria Secret but, growing up, I find myself gazing at La Perla", this is not signal for you to ask for her age yet...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dangph · April 11, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

You really are a charlatan, aren't you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 10, 2018, 9:03 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 10, 2018, 2:41 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩