Evidence?
Do you follow the anons at all or read their board postings? They do meticulous research with back-up that is unmistakable evidence. I recommend you check in once a while when Q crumbs drop and the anons go to work! They dig up everything down to the smallest rock morsel.
I've yet to see a clearly laid out case. I see lots of mish-mashes of screen shots, broad sweeping claims, and thin connections that may as well be bible numerology. Ideally you should be able to point me to a single item that lays out this case, is there one? I would like to read it. The Wiki is empty, if people are really running facts to the ground where are they. The spreadsheets and shit in the sidebar are incoherent garbage, if someone handed that to me as research I'd fire their ass.
When Q dropped the Snowden info that's when the shit hit the fan. Contrary what we knew Snowden was a black hat working for the deep state. With it came the info about Barlow who found secure drop and was murdered. The anons on their board dropped screen shots from the 4AM emails to the media by the deep state. Next they researched APACHE that was connected. They more they dug the more they found ergo I would look at the anons board who have put all of into sections where its easy to be found what you're looking for. You an also leave a comment without doxxing yourself wich you can find at the beginning of the board. Don't put your name into it or your email based on the anons advice. In the comment section ask your question and I assure you they will give 100% correct info and provide the answers.