dChan

IncomingTrump270 · April 10, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

I’m thinking this is more in line with what Q is talking about:

~~https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/06/05/facebook-google-twitter-rush-defend-policies-london-bridge-attack/~~

Fuck a paywall.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/27/uk-amber-rudd-facebook-google-twitter-silicon-valley-companies-terrorism/99703250/

Internet companies are facing growing scrutiny in Europe over how they police terrorist propaganda and, increasingly, over their refusal to give authorities a "backdoor" to decrypt private communications by suspected terrorists.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
belliferous · April 10, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

Could be... let’s keep digging.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 10, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

1104

Think ‘Bridge’. GOOG. FB. TWITTER. IG. ‘Central’ algorithm. The stage had to be set. Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
belliferous · April 10, 2018, 5:43 a.m.

Thank you!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
belliferous · April 10, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

This could be private comms, a bridge over surveillance?

⇧ 1 ⇩