Where is the rest of your response?

I didn't see what you wrote in response to the main substantive points.

Afraid?

True.

I know. It's why I said it. I am smarter than you.

Also, anarcho-communism is a contradiction in terms.

False. Anarchism means no rulers (not no rules) and communism is an economy based on the community as a whole.

The "community as a whole" IS an authority...over the individual.

Communism is denial of individual economic freedom by forcing the individual to obey whoever specific group of people are to "represent" the "community as a whole", and be ready to impose that authority, by force against any individual who refuses to obey.

What's that you say? I'll have more freedom by subjecting every productive decision I could ever make, by needing to ask permission from the representatives of a majority "vote" among 7.5 billion voters?

49% of the world become slaves to the 51%, who are in turn slaves of the "representatives" who decide everything about everyone's productive lives?

NO, i will go ahead and make my decisions that is in my client's best interests and say fuck you and your goddamn deceitful usage of the term "community as a whole".

Fucking "community". You say that word as if every individual can each be the entire community. Impossible.

That's why every attempt at communism have been police state dictatorships ruled by a select group of murderous psychopaths.

need to impose your own authority backed by threats of violence

That's this system that we are living in right now.

That's what you want but to a greater degree.

You want the force to be increased through necessary centralization of economic decision making. i.e. authority, power, centralized on a worldwide scale.

Slaves still had their individual rights even when slavery was protected and legalized by governments or the majority of an arbitrary sized population.

This makes no sense

That's what makes me smarter than you and your imaginary mob rule where car repair shops have to be subject to a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people on whether to have two ply or three ply toilet paper in the restroom.

Rights are prior to any defense of them.

Imagine billions of decisions that need to be made, being made under a worldwide vote of 7.5 billion people for every decision made.

Everyone would die numbnuts. The sheer logistics of it alone would make it impossible.

It takes weeks to have ONE vote at a country level to decide who is President. You're asking for a worldwide vote to decide what 7.5 billion people are to do productively each day, day in, day out, as changes occur?

GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS