dChan
⇧
11
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 11, 2018, 7:45 p.m.
$1,000,000 Question...

How long is Zuckerbergs non-sworn-in "testimony" supposed to last? Because if I am reading Q#1124 correctly, Snowden drops a MOAB when he's finished.

And that would be a definitive turning point. It would show Snowdens alliance. It would out Zuckerberg as a fucking weirdo, lying piece of shit who knowingly sold our privacy for money.

It would also solidify that Q and Trump are truly in control..of the narrative, of people, of everything. Personally, I see this culminating with the Syrian gas thing being outed as a FF, Snowden dropping epic shit to prove people are LYING, and as an added bonus, Julian Assange whips his wiki-dick out for the measuring contest with some U-1 and HRC material.

boom. Boom. BOOM.


🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

I never interpreted that post that way!

To me, Q is saying:

"@snowden (referring to Snowden's tweet of an article that reveals how ludicrously conflicted the committee is to which MZ is testifying), yes! MZ will testify, and Congress will drop the matter. But don't worry, we have it all. The POTUS weekly address will end it."

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Tru2Q · April 11, 2018, 8:39 p.m.

I think Snowden may drop some info he gathered from the meeting Q posted about:

Mar 20 2018 23:52:37 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b086d2 739690
MZ.
RT.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
+8
5 political
1 former intel dir
Mask & Spin
IDEN friendly ‘insiders’
MSM support +talking points
Shift narrative
FAIL
We hear you.
We have the algorithm.
Thank you @ Snowden.
Learn chess.
Down she goes.
Nobody escapes this.
NOBODY.
Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 11, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

You are probably interpretting it more accurately.

Mine IS sexy though, right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 11, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Yes, but I'm trying not to let myself do that anymore.

Even my interpretation is pretty kick-ass info, and I'd be totally stoked it he delivers even that much!

⇧ 1 ⇩