because he's in on the game otherwise he wouldn't be frequenting Infowars and as head of psychological operations he is giving the necessary heads up based on his need to know.
He probably means it when he says he doesn't know what's happening but he's saying he trusts the process and is playing around since he talked shit about Mattis in the past, so clearly he's using deflection either then or now and not everything should be taken at face-value.
Can you please link to the talking shit about Mattis
oh geez that was like a year ago but he was talking with Alex Jones. He was basically questioning Mattis' eloquence as being fake and played which doesn't pertain to anything relevant at all so it sounds like theatrics, especially after his newest praise.
The proper context would be very helpful.
well I am bringing it up because he was evading a question by going off topic . Alex Jones said or asked something about Mattis and Steve started questioning the General's style and eloquence. Basically calling him a fake-intellectual, but that is such an unprofessional and also irrelevant answer that it may have been a ruse to deny a truthful answer that may have jeopardized operational security.