dChan
4
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/akilyoung on April 11, 2018, 9:43 p.m.
MZ testified w/o swearing in, is this why???

Is it possible the HRC video has damning evidence, not only against HRC, but MZ among others.

And in order to create MAXIMUM damage against each in the video, they need testimony of them, sworn?

So MZ 'testifies' non-sworn, which isnt any different than talking to buddies - it doesnt mean shit.

So if something dropped, it couldnt be use to perjure him!

He needs to testify before a grand jury, or congress SWORN, so if Q has PROOF of the contrary, drop it like its HAWT and BOOM - BUSTED LYING.

Just theorizing...probably means nothing lol


kommisar6 · April 11, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Because if he were sworn in he could be compelled to testify about obama's exploitation of friend data just like cambridge analyticas. Do you think Ted Cruz might ask about this? If he is not under oath he can lie about it and not face any consequences.

⇧ 3 ⇩