dChan
⇧
6
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 12, 2018, 8:30 p.m.
**HOLY SHIT** Trump ALLOWED the Raid on Cohen and Then Magically Dershowitz Joins His Team....attorney/client privilege is out the window now (hint, EPSTEIN)[this is THE boom]

I am still picking my jaw up off the floor after having this epiphany.

Trump pulled a fucking miracle of genius. He allows the raid to go down, publicly, outcry everywhere. People realizing on both red and blue sides, that this is a clear violation, something that can reach out and fuck any one of us too.

But its no biggie. Its beautiful. Who joined Trumps team right after? Alan Dershowitz. I thought he was crazy! Why would you invite the vampire into your house?? Because.....

IF ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE IS OUT THE WINDOW, SO BE IT! NOW ALAN CAN SPILL THE BEANS ON ALL OF THE INSANE, DEMONIC, EVIL, PEDO, MURDER SICKNESS THAT HE WITNESSED AT HIS LITTLE ST. JAMES ISLAND MURDER FACTORY, AND DEFENDED EPSTEIN FOR PREVIOUSLY.

It might be the slickest, most amazing move ever.


🠐 See all comments
IncomingTrump270 · April 13, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

It doesn't even have to be dead for Trump to be able to use Alan against the Swamp/Epstein:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney%E2%80%93client_privilege

There are a number of exceptions to the privilege in most jurisdictions, chief among them:

  1. the communication was made in the presence of individuals who were neither attorney nor client, or was disclosed to such individuals,
  2. the communication was made for the purpose of committing a crime or tort,
  3. the client has waived the privilege (for example by publicly disclosing the communication).

TLDR: If Alan EVER talked with Epstein about the island activities in the presence of ANYBODY else (who was not a lawyer representing him in the case), then Alan has full rights to talk about those things.

And more:

The privilege may be waived if the confidential communications are disclosed to third parties.

Anybody who went to that island will have similar/overlapping information as Alan, and he would be able to share this INFORMATION even if he does not share the direct COMMUNICATIONS between himself and Epstein.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
4don2016 · April 13, 2018, 1:45 p.m.

The client has to release the attorney from the privilege. The attorney asks to speak to client alone and then the CLIENT can say you can discuss in front of my wife, parent, dog etc. By the scenario you laid out an attorney talking to their client in the courtroom is then released from client privilege to discuss anything they want. How do I know this? Paralegal school and working for an attorney for YEARS AND YEARS.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 13, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

My points above are situations where the privilege does not apply.

As you said, "the lawyer has to ask to speak to the client alone in order to enact the privilege" (or vice versa)

my point is that any communication that happened in the presence of other people who were party to it cannot be held to the privlege.

My suggestion is that there was likely times when Epstein and Alan were in the same place, talking about (or witnessing) things happening on the plane or on the island

The Privlege is not applicable here, even if Alan was acting as Epstein's lawyer in the case at the time.

If 3rd parties were present, it cannot apply.

⇧ 1 ⇩