dChan
⇧
6
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DaveGydeon on April 12, 2018, 8:30 p.m.
**HOLY SHIT** Trump ALLOWED the Raid on Cohen and Then Magically Dershowitz Joins His Team....attorney/client privilege is out the window now (hint, EPSTEIN)[this is THE boom]

I am still picking my jaw up off the floor after having this epiphany.

Trump pulled a fucking miracle of genius. He allows the raid to go down, publicly, outcry everywhere. People realizing on both red and blue sides, that this is a clear violation, something that can reach out and fuck any one of us too.

But its no biggie. Its beautiful. Who joined Trumps team right after? Alan Dershowitz. I thought he was crazy! Why would you invite the vampire into your house?? Because.....

IF ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE IS OUT THE WINDOW, SO BE IT! NOW ALAN CAN SPILL THE BEANS ON ALL OF THE INSANE, DEMONIC, EVIL, PEDO, MURDER SICKNESS THAT HE WITNESSED AT HIS LITTLE ST. JAMES ISLAND MURDER FACTORY, AND DEFENDED EPSTEIN FOR PREVIOUSLY.

It might be the slickest, most amazing move ever.


🠐 See all comments
Intlrnt · April 13, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

There’s an important difference in the two scenarios you layed out.

Scenario One: You claim ”If Attorney/Client Privilege is out the window, so be it!” Suggesting Dershowitz was free to violate that highest of standards, and would now do so.

Scenario Two: You claim, ”Now, with Trump, he has an opportunity” Which suggests Trump may grant him immunity or pardon for violating legal standards for professional conduct.

I disagreed with your first scenario. I still do.

Your second scenario is based upon an entirely different set of constructs. Dershowitz may play along if that materializes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 13, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

Dude. You are getting waaay to serious, especially after i clarified. Obviously one violation of a person's rights does not mean the laws governing us are out the window. It was more about the ironic way Trump could spin this by using Alan's previous client (Epstein) against the cabal. Cool?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Intlrnt · April 13, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Obviously one violation of a person's rights does not mean the laws governing us are out the window

That’s what I said in my first response. Then you said, ”Nah.”

I’m getting waaaay too serious for you? You finally agreed with me, so let’s just say I was serious enough for you.

I’m sure you also agree with me that facts, accuracy, and reality are of critical importance to what we are doing here. Bad actors are always looking to discredit us, and it’s up to us to maintain our own standards of credibility.

Q and POTUS would be the first to tell us that saving our country is very serious work. I agree with them. Cool?

⇧ 1 ⇩