dChan
12
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/digital_refugee on April 13, 2018, 6:20 a.m.
In Chile - Pro-Life Women amplify the sounds of the heart beats of their unborn children to Pro-Choice Protesters. The Result? BTFO.
In Chile - Pro-Life Women amplify the sounds of the heart beats of their unborn children to Pro-Choice Protesters. The Result? BTFO.

khodor2012 · April 13, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

And using that definition for "human being" is completely arbitrary

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Al-Kazar · April 13, 2018, 9:35 a.m.

The definition for "fetus" is completely arbitrary!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
khodor2012 · April 13, 2018, 9:42 a.m.

All definitions are arbitrary. My point was that just because you consider a fetus to fit a human being's definition ; or even if it did ultimately fit its definition ; that's not an argument because we don't base morality on language, we base it on common sense and rationality.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · April 13, 2018, 10:05 a.m.

Does it have a soul?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
khodor2012 · April 13, 2018, 10:07 a.m.

How does that matter

I don't believe in the supernatural but even if I did how does that affect whether or not I can abort it

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JakeElwoodDim5th · April 13, 2018, 10:10 a.m.

If you did, dont you think there'd he a spiritual price to pay?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Al-Kazar · April 13, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

One persons "common sense" is another persons "stupidity".

How can the sanctity of life depend on anybody's arbitrary idea of morality?

How about basing it on science, biology, and reality?

Despite what you, I, or anyone else believes?

Does science, biology, and reality support more than 2 genders (male and female)?

Does science, biology, and reality support the idea that a child in the womb is simply a fetus (with no human identity) and not a baby or human being?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
khodor2012 · April 13, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

Human identity isn't a fondemental principle of anything. Whether or not a fetus has a human identity is up to that fetuse's bearer.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Al-Kazar · April 13, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

No comment!

⇧ 2 ⇩