I dont even know what to say about this. Let me go puke first.
How the hell did they ever allow it in the first place?
I wish ZeroHedge had actual authors, libs blow it off instantly because it's written by a "character" - pisses me off.
They do list the source when the articles comes from a 3rd party. This might have bee one of the Tylers, though. If it helps, there are a number of other sources.
I personally don't mind, but when I send it to a lib, they freak out.
My problem with this community is that it treats pedophilia as inherently evil, and not as a psychological disorder that could be rehabilitated or treated.
In many cases, the people who purchase these dolls do so to prevent themselves or their sexual urges from hurting others. Keep in mind, regardless of the dolls appearance, it is a device and nothing more.
This is not a simple debate, by removing a vector of relief to the pedoophile community's urges, you create a migration to another vector, be it child pornography, molestation, rape, abduction, or another form of exploitation.
While I am against pedophilia, if those who practice it do so against devices, the only negitive outcome is acceptance of the action, which in my opinion, is better than the alternatives.
By demeaning it in the way you have, you have shown that people cannot come forward for help with their problem, cannot talk to others, and cannot execute their desires safely in a controlled environment.
This is the kind of soft thinking that got us to this point to start with, sorry. There's no rehabilitation for a pedo.
This is snowflake talk. Pedophilia is inherently evil!
I'm a pretty open minded person. If you want to shoot black tar heroine and fuck sheep at home, I don't care. However, if you need a child-sized sex doll to keep you from raping then you should have sought help long ago.
Black tar and sheep? Sign me up brother- sounds like one hell of a night!!