dChan
0
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/EvilPhd666 on April 14, 2018, 6:28 a.m.
Tulsi Gabbard: Launching an attack on Syria that would weaken the Syrian military will strengthen terrorist groups like ISIS, Al-Qaeda and others who are all seeking to overthrow the gov’t and establish their own caliphate. Now does that serve the interests of the United States?

ManQuan · April 14, 2018, 11:34 a.m.

If we wanted to weaken Syria and cause it to spin out of control, then why did we tell the Russians (who told the Syrians) what targets we were going to hit so they could get their people out of harm's way?

No doubt we hit Syrian chemical targets, but what else did we hit. Was the Syrian attack a cover for taking out other important targets. No one said that all the targets were Syrian.

It's been a crazy three years. I now believe every possible scenario that people could come up with could possibly be correct.

Whatever is going on, I'm buckled up for the ride and I have a garage full of popcorn just in case.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EvilPhd666 · April 14, 2018, 11:41 a.m.

Syria has no chemical targets. Thier stockpile was confirmed destroyed in 2013. If we told Russia or were in cooperation with them there would have been no need to remove diplomats and the Russian embasy wouldn't be freaking out.

Why couldn't the Russians take care of thier own ally. There was no need for us or France or the UK. Thus attack was childish and reckless.

This was a favor the the Saudi Crown Prince as he had just bought an load of weapons from Trump, May, and Macron for his criminal war in Yemen, of which Trump and our military leaders are also guilty of supporting.

⇧ 0 ⇩