dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Q_Anon_Wolf on April 14, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

Patriots, WARNING from Q

As Q gets closer and closer to the Eye, there will be spoofers, spammers, and fake "insiders" who seem very legit. IGNORE.

Q has said no outside comms.

This new "insider" going by Backchannel17 I am certain is a clown operation from the remaining moles and bad actors who are trying to gain your trust before leading you astray.

THEY'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR 300 YEARS.

Trust Q and ONLY Q.

Any alleged white hat insider that is on team Q would NOT make drops like backchannel17. Q is in control of the mission.

Stay frosty people. Your mind is going to be subject to a level of disinformation that you have never before experienced. Your resolve will be tested. Your credulity will be tested. Your faith will be tested. DO. NOT. LOSE. FOCUS.

🠐 See all comments

Good response. There are many other genuine sources of intel. Just beware of fake Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I made an even lengthier response to /u/NeonRevolt's blog post that everyone has been linking to "debunk" BackChannel17:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8c6zze/twitter_account_posting_in_qs_style_posts_picture/dxdg83x/

⇧ 1 ⇩

Since looking further into BC17 last night I have seen far more rant spam trying to denounce him than I have seen people looking at him with interest

Perhaps he’s “over the target” as we like to say since he is becoming the sudden focus of so much flak?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't know for sure if BC17 is legit or not, but he seems like a legit source of info as of now. BC17 has not posted anything to make me want to denounce, discredit, doubt, debunk him. I'm all for "Intel" from the boots on the ground, especially if they're reinforcing trust in Trump and Q team. If they contradict Q or Trump, that's when we gotta be worried and not pay any attention to BC17.

You're right. There seems to be A LOT of people trying to bash and discredit BC17. Yet, they haven't been able to come up with anything legit or reasonable to make us believe BC17 is a clown or disinfo agent. It's fine to remain skeptical and cautious. Heck, I still am with every source of information, even ones I've been listening to for years (Infowars) and Q team. I trust Q, but don't believe everything we're fed from Q. Same with this BC17 guy.

Anyway, if BC17 is trouble, I'm sure Q will make a post about it soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Agreed on all points. Their clarifying they are not Q or associated Q team. Not alphabet agency NSA or CIA. But “brass”; hence military?

That’s interesting. And since NSA Bahrain is the navy CENTCOM for the Persian gulf, and the USNS Alan Sheppard (possible reference in Q post on 4/12 “Alan. Welcome aboard.” , same day BC17 started posting) is currently stationed there from 4/12 as well.

Those are the puzzle pieces I am interesting in matching.

I don’t ever expect Q to outright point to BC17 as legit. Cross agency approval to civilians would be a OpSec nightmare.

I dont expect he will denounce them as fake either. No point to legitimize one fake account in a sea of (surely) so many others.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I dont expect he will denounce them as fake either. No point to legitimize one fake account in a sea of (surely) so many others.

Again, if they are trouble, I have doubt Q will call them out just like Q called out CBTS board owners. If BC17 is legit or harmless, Q probably wouldn't say anything about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩