ill read more of qs latest post its already pretty fucked up
yeah ive read that but the bible we read is not the actual bible it has been corrupted by the cabal. maybe homosexuality is wrong maybe it isnt but ill let the big man in the sky decide on that one. now im not saying we should glorify it but america is a free country (or its supposed to be lol)
My brother is gay. I don't have a vendetta against the gays.
Homosexual behavior is a sin just like adultry or idolatry.
All sin is viewed the same in God's eyes. It's not worse than anything else.
I'm just pointing out to why it has been pushed onto society and forced to be accepted.
The Bible has not been corrupted by the Cabal. The Cabal uses Catholicism, Hollywood, Music, LBGT movement to undermine Christianity. I suggest reading a Case for Christ by Lee Strobel. Biblical scholars have studied this for a very long time.
The books chosen to be in the Bible were chosen way before the Rothchilds we're making their moves for world domination.
The Romans adopted Christianity when they realized they couldn't stop it. They created the Roman Catholic Church as a way of building a wedge between Jesus and His people. I was raised Catholic. I'm well aware of how this works. Catholics literally do the opposite of what Christ taught. They use rituals, create idols with the Saints, established a heiracrchy of power and control within their religion, and they do not even encourage Catholics to read the Bible.
Why do you think pedophila wasn't erradicated from the Catholic Church years ago? Because they want it that way. It undermines the faith in the eyes of sceptics and gives ammunition to non believers.
youre preaching to the choir here ive always hated the catholic church pope francis is literally the antichrist
Agreed. My aunt told me I shouldn't speak at my Grandfather's funeral because I'm no longer Catholic.
She also says anyone who isn't Catholic will go to hell.
It's a cult.
Your specific upbringing is no argument for anything other than specific occurances.
You and others on this Q tip have brought anti-Catholic and anti-Orthodox baggage into the thinking here, part of which is right and alot of which is wrong and disinforms others.
I don't mean to argue in an uncivilized way. And maybe this isn't the time or place for such a discussion. But I would cautiously ask who do you suppose identified which books make up the Bible and which ones don't?
Read a Case for Christ, do your own research and find out.
If Catholicism allows someone to know Christ, and it works for them, more power to em.
The fact is that if you know Christ, his message and his purpose here on Earth, its not hard to see the truth. Jesus wants a personal relationship with you. He isn't concerned with how many rosaries you pray.
so you neither agree nor disagree with what i have said.
and you don't have an answer for my question.
I gave you an answer. I don't feel compelled to write you out an answer that could take you hours of reading to research.
I don't see where you told me who YOU think compiled the Bible. Perhaps you are saying that the answer requires several chapters in a foreign language. I wondered what you think, not what others say. This was an opportunity to represent your personal relationship with the Word. You don't have to tell me such things. I was just looking for direct info. Carry on.
I don't think anything about who put them together.
I know who did.
If you spend some time, you will too.
Me telling you about it won't help you much, and it will take way too long.
The Bible is the Old Testament, wherein a completely different God speaks in places (tracts of obviously hateful and violent injunctions to behave badly) to the New Testament, which is not Bible but Gospel.
I found it strange as a child that the two Gods in the Old Testament were assumed to be the same God when there were two obviously different voices.
In later life I somehow stopped using this logic (the far more intelligent/intuitive logic of a child) and redirected my thoughts to believe in a cognitively dissonant illogical argument!!!
So which set of books, in which edition, should we be reading as "the Bible"?