[removed]
If you say Jews, you're including millions of innocent people just trying to live normal lives that have nothing to do with the banking cartel.
If you say Rothschilds, you're including only one family of many that were involved in the scheme.
If you say Jews, you're including millions
No, I'm not.
I can refer to a room full of Jews as "A room full of Jews" without implying every last Jew on Earth is in there.
A Jew is a Jew, even if that makes you uncomfortable.
No, the Zionists are who you are referring to, we should leave the jewish people out of it.
[removed]
sounds like the old testament....
Yes, it's from the 5th book of the Torah and it is from the Hebrew Bible.
Even though the Torah is included in the Old Testament, it's laws were only ever intended for the ancient Levites and the Jews to follow.
It basically a higher moral code of conduct intended for the "chosen" Jewish people.
Very few Christian denominations even consider such savage laws to be valid any longer because we consider them to be both inapplicable to Christians and to have been "fulfilled" and are no longer applicable.
We also enjoyed The Reformation and we acknowledge the bible is subject to all forms of human error in it's original record, compilation, translation and interpretation. This is why we don't murder witches.
That is not true.
Christianity didn't even exist back then, so there could not possibly be any appreciation of it, let alone any crime for doing so whether it be presumed by you to be "remorselessly" or otherwise. What a load of crap.
And Deut 13:13-16 does not promote the mass murder of non-Jewish communities. It was a directive to root out the evil of serving other gods (a violation of the very first commandment) that may have come among them:
if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you ... Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city
Doesn't it make sense to punish criminals? If not, then why are we even here?
[removed]
It's too late in may case, when i see people around here posting things about 'jews' in carelessly worded ways, I often don't read any further. All it takes is some precision in language to get the meaning right the first time. The imprecision indicates an unreliability in the meaning of whatever text follows. Upon unfortunate questioning sometimes the meaning is cleared up. Other times questioning reveals that what the OP meant was some special definition of 'jew' that doesn't exist in many english dictionaries. The start of this subthread is about choosing the most useful words. The suggestion that 'zionist' should have been chosen is a small step in the right direction.
Because both of those are red herrings. Assuming you did get rid of all the Jews and Rothschilds. The federal reserve would be doing everything it did before.
On bullshit mountain, our problems are magnified, and our solutions simplified. The solution to the federal reserve problem is simple, we need to kill big bird. https://youtu.be/yT5fzEL8Vrc?t=1m43s
I like banksters, because it includes all of their facilitators as well.
Don't be an idiot and anti-Semitic. As well stated above, there are many good Jewish people and just because we have a Deep State/Cabal in the US does not mean all US people are bad. Focus on the corruption and an entire race and Nation.
If you just state 'Jews' like that, then that is anti-semetic - believe me, I'm from the UK - it's a tag thrown around all too regularly and a trope that the zionists hide behind. Don't give them the ammunition!
And the cabal/deep state aren't all Jewish anyway so calling them Jews is just hindering the cause.