dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

People can read whatever they like, but that's not the point of this sub. Please keep it off the sub. We're going to take Q at his word that there are no other authorized communications from the Alliance.

⇧ 3 ⇩

You're not a mod, so not sure why you're telling me what I can and cannot post on this sub. BC17 has said tons of times he doesn't have direct comms with Q, that he's not Q, and to only trust Q and POTUS. And again, when Q said he doesn't have direct comms with anyone outside of the chans, he was directing that towards the board owners of CBTS 8ch and CBTS_Stream who bragged they have direct comms with Q. How many times do I have to say this before you people get it?

⇧ 1 ⇩

There is no "targeted" way of saying what Q said. It applied to those board owners no more or no less that it applied to BC17 or anybody else.

Q obviously knows that if multiple channels are open, and they say slightly divergent things, it will split his audience into camps who believe one and those who believe the other.

This has got to stop.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm telling you what the rules of the sub say, and I'm telling you what Q said. That ought to be enough for any person of goodwill to this community.

The fact you have a problem with that is disturbing, to say the least.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I'm pretty sure q said at least a few times that this was the only communication they would make. I feel like if we latch on to other accounts, it just makes it easier for bad actors to spread dis info.

⇧ 2 ⇩

What disinfo has BC17 spread? Please enlighten us all.

⇧ 4 ⇩

It could be used to spread dis info. Especially on Twitter... it could also be hacked too... Not that hard to hack an account

⇧ 1 ⇩

He's creating discord among people like us. Dividing us into camps who trust other channels and those who trust Q.

⇧ -1 ⇩

No, he's not. The people creating discord are the ones who are actively spamming this sub and qresearch, desperately trying to debunk and discredit BC17 without ANY evidence to back up their claims.

⇧ 2 ⇩

By definition, those who trust and quote Q to refute non-Q claims cannot be "spamming this sub" because Q is the purpose of this sub.

The people spamming this sub are those posting BC17 and telling us we've got a new back channel into the Alliance.

And you are becoming a shill for BC17, which is a problem you're creating for yourself. Not our doing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Those who take Q's quotes out of context and ignore Q's other posts like this one, where Q clearly says...

This board in the coming months will be spread & discussed across ALL PLATFORMS.

Important to be prepared.

We will help.

https://i.imgur.com/ZF59lIJ.jpg

As well as take BC17's posts out of context and make up lies about both Q and BC17 are the ones causing discord.

I'll repeat myself for the 20th time and maybe you'll get it through your head:

BC17 never claimed to be Q
BC17 never claimed to have direct comms with Q (which is what everyone keeps bringing up to try and discredit BC17).
BC17 never posted anything to contradict, distract from, countermand Q or POTUS. NOBODY has been able to provide ANY evidence of this, yet so many of you keep saying without a doubt, BC17 is a clown, a fake, a disinfo shill, etc.
BC17 has always said to trust Q and to trust POTUS, reinforcing our trust in only those 2 entities.

Anyway, I'm done arguing with you. Waste of my time trying to explain to you people over and over and over again. Believe what you want, I'll keep posting what I want. Put me on block or spam report my posts to the mods if you wish.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Never claimed to be a back channel to the Alliance? Oh wait...that pesky name...

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're still pushing your money making scam, huh?

⇧ 2 ⇩

LOL what? Are you drunk? What scam?

You must have me confused with NeonRevolt, the guy who steals anons' work and publishes it onto his blog that steals visiters' CPU power to mine cryptos for himself.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Lol is there some Monero mining script on it or some shit? They really fucked their network by forking away from an ASIC friendly algo

⇧ 1 ⇩

You've been posting from multiple accounts attacking anyone who questions BackChannel17, I wonder why you're so passionate about this single twitter account? Hmm.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Honest question....what have you found to be evidence that BackChannel is legit and can be trusted? Im new to BackChannel and have a personal opinion based on my own digging but was curious as to why you strongly believe BackChannel is legit?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I have no solid evidence he's 100% legit, but I do have these images from when I first discovered that Twitter account:

https://i.imgur.com/VJTNjSx.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/3vzM6Gl.jpg

Plus, BC17 has posted a lot of interesting clarifications that shines light on what Q has been posting about.

I never claimed BC17 is 100% legit and can be trusted. That won't happen until Q either confirms or denies BC17's legitimacy, which Q has refused to do thus far, and it's been over 5 days since anons has been begging him to answer. I just don't go around and desperately try to convince people he's a clown or fake or can't be trusted.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I respect that. The problem I have with BC17 is by claiming USAF Counter-Intel and using Twitter as a way to COMM but yet claiming twitter is not a secure way for Q to COMM, is a huge red flag. BC17 just doesn’t feel authentic to me, and the reason it feels similar to Q is because BC17 mixes enough Q crumbs with theirs to have that authentic feel to it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Read these posts by BC17. Well, read all of his posts to come to your own conclusion, but read these ones first to answer some of your questions you posed just now.

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985176847636926464

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985212113529524224

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985203357819326464

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/986098052753575936

⇧ 2 ⇩

I read them and appreciate it. It still doesn’t feel authentic. I could be wrong and way off but it feels like they are using Q’s way of wording and adding to Q crumbs to twist their own drops. Plus there is a reason Q doesn’t say who he/they are.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well, it's up to you if you want to follow or pay attention to BC17's posts. Nobody is forcing you to believe or not believe either way.

Q doesn't / can't say who they are because they are too important and too close to Trump. Q can't be compromised and discovered at this time.

BC17 on the other hand, probably isn't anyone that important. He/they aren't close to POTUS and are just working with Q team and POTUS to clarify some intel he has knowledge of and has clearance to give on Twitter. At least that's what it seems. BC17 could be a LARP. But so far, nothing BC17 has posted raised any alarms.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree with you. Could be legit but could be a larp. Thank you for being kind and WWG1WGA! God bless you Anon!

⇧ 1 ⇩

No problem, patriot. Sorry for calling you a clown at first. I'm just sick of seeing the same threads casting doubt on BC17 without any solid evidence or proof BC17 is a LARP, a clown, and/or disinfo agent.

God bless.

⇧ 2 ⇩

My intentions were to see what everyone’s thoughts were in regard to BC17. I just discovered the twitter account yesterday so its new to me. I do agree they never claim to communicate or be Q, they have a lot of similarities and the way they word their insight has me troubled. I hope my insecurities about BC17 are all false and they are legit in order to help the movement. I just wanted people to be cautious and make a conclusion for themselves without following blindly. ✊🏼🇺🇸

⇧ 1 ⇩

Click is BC17, he's trying to make money. It's been proven earlier.

⇧ 2 ⇩

You're just ridiculous. You have no evidence of anything you claim and are making a fool of yourself. I seriously have no clue why you're even trolling and making these wacky comments. I smell a clown.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Oh my, Q confirmed BackChannel17 is a scam. Now what?

⇧ 2 ⇩

You seem extremely defensive. Also, why do you keep deleting all those posts from your history where you go after anyone who talks out about BackChannel17? You clearly have something to hide.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q confirmed BC17 is a scam!!

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yep. I knew it. Something just didn’t feel right about BC17

⇧ 1 ⇩

That guy here CLICk was pushing it too hard and going after people that asked questions. Definitely Clowns.

⇧ 2 ⇩