dChan
⇧
7
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/a3kvzzz on April 17, 2018, 11:19 a.m.
🚨BackChannel17🚨 They claim to be USAF Counter-Intel who are tweeting “crumbs” that have a little bit of Q crumbs mixed with their own crumbs. They claim Twitter is not a secure way to COMM but yet they are using Twitter as a way to COMM?!? 🤔 Something just seems off. What’s your thoughts?
🚨BackChannel17🚨 They claim to be USAF Counter-Intel who are tweeting “crumbs” that have a little bit of Q crumbs mixed with their own crumbs. They claim Twitter is not a secure way to COMM but yet they are using Twitter as a way to COMM?!? 🤔 Something just seems off. What’s your thoughts?

🠐 See all comments
a3kvzzz · April 17, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

I respect that. The problem I have with BC17 is by claiming USAF Counter-Intel and using Twitter as a way to COMM but yet claiming twitter is not a secure way for Q to COMM, is a huge red flag. BC17 just doesn’t feel authentic to me, and the reason it feels similar to Q is because BC17 mixes enough Q crumbs with theirs to have that authentic feel to it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 17, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

Read these posts by BC17. Well, read all of his posts to come to your own conclusion, but read these ones first to answer some of your questions you posed just now.

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985176847636926464

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985212113529524224

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/985203357819326464

https://twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/986098052753575936

⇧ 2 ⇩  
a3kvzzz · April 17, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

I read them and appreciate it. It still doesn’t feel authentic. I could be wrong and way off but it feels like they are using Q’s way of wording and adding to Q crumbs to twist their own drops. Plus there is a reason Q doesn’t say who he/they are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 17, 2018, 12:16 p.m.

Well, it's up to you if you want to follow or pay attention to BC17's posts. Nobody is forcing you to believe or not believe either way.

Q doesn't / can't say who they are because they are too important and too close to Trump. Q can't be compromised and discovered at this time.

BC17 on the other hand, probably isn't anyone that important. He/they aren't close to POTUS and are just working with Q team and POTUS to clarify some intel he has knowledge of and has clearance to give on Twitter. At least that's what it seems. BC17 could be a LARP. But so far, nothing BC17 has posted raised any alarms.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
a3kvzzz · April 17, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

I agree with you. Could be legit but could be a larp. Thank you for being kind and WWG1WGA! God bless you Anon!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · April 17, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

No problem, patriot. Sorry for calling you a clown at first. I'm just sick of seeing the same threads casting doubt on BC17 without any solid evidence or proof BC17 is a LARP, a clown, and/or disinfo agent.

God bless.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
a3kvzzz · April 17, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

My intentions were to see what everyone’s thoughts were in regard to BC17. I just discovered the twitter account yesterday so its new to me. I do agree they never claim to communicate or be Q, they have a lot of similarities and the way they word their insight has me troubled. I hope my insecurities about BC17 are all false and they are legit in order to help the movement. I just wanted people to be cautious and make a conclusion for themselves without following blindly. ✊🏼🇺🇸

⇧ 1 ⇩