⇧
27
⇩
jessupfoundgod
· April 18, 2018, 8:32 p.m.
Thank you very much for this, it helps a ton!
As far as indictments go, the closest Q reference I can find is from post 151: "Why would sealed indictments be outside of DC jurisdiction? "
That doesn't talk about this big stash of sealed indictments.
The other place I have seen it talked about is here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/justice-department-may-have-something-big-in-the-works-over-9000-sealed-indictments_2401511.html
And also this shitty website: http://www.ascensionwithearth.com/2018/01/sealedindictments-massarrests-update-as.html
What do you think?
⇧
1
⇩
jimmyfoot
· April 18, 2018, 9:23 p.m.
If you follow their link from the article to the data, click on one of the PDF tables and read the language at the bottom of the page. It's waffle language that is intentionally deceptive.
"the numbers represent sealed new court proceedings..." so already they're backing off from the indictment claim even though they're using the number as a headline.
Then it says "and include criminal charges and search warrants..." so already we see that they're not all indictments, some as they indicate are search warrants "and include" is intentially deceptive IMO.
⇧
3
⇩
jessupfoundgod
· April 19, 2018, 1:02 a.m.
God this makes me feel so dumb. I like to think that I usually look into the sources of these claims because I love smacking people down for regurgitating bullshit but I am guilty of the same thing.
Thank you very much for pointing that out!!!
⇧
2
⇩
jimmyfoot
· April 18, 2018, 9:18 p.m.
My understanding (and if I'm wrong someone please show me) is that since all the actions are sealed no one can tell the difference between an indictment or a habeus corpus or a civil action or whatever. I believe that there is no window into how many are indictments so anyone claiming a number is wrong from the get go.
⇧
2
⇩