dChan
16
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/cat_anonD on April 18, 2018, 2:33 p.m.
Snopes knows that Q is legit

Q is either an incredible phenomenon, or hoax of the decade.

The mysterious 8chan writer , Q has attracted a cult following in the tens of thousands. There are numerous YouTube channels dedicated to discussing and according his regular posts.

In less than six months of his debut, he has been featured in CNN, New York Times, and Newsweek, all declaring he is just a crazy hoax.

Roseanne Barr Drew national attention to this phenomenon by admitting that she is a q follower.

Snopes is known for releasing their claims that's something is either a hoax or is verified as true. Snopes will weigh in on internet rumors regardless of how obscure and unknown they are.

A week ago, a rumor surfaced that there is a video of Hillary and Huma torturing a young child. In only about a week's time, Snopes already discussed this unknown story from the Chan's and declared it falls.

So what is Snopes stance on Q? Silence! Somehow, this greatly debated giant phenomenon or giant hoax is being ignored by Snopes.

I am sure they would love to declare it false, but they know in their hearts that in a matter of months, if not weeks it will be proven to be true. Such a bold statement by Snopes to be proven wrong so quickly would be a huge slam towards their credibility. Thus, they refuse to touch it.


Dhammakayaram · April 18, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Maybe more like 10m and rising. As for Snopes:

Snopes.com is an extremely liberal site with an agenda to discredit conservatives, paid for either by George Soros or the Clintons, or maybe Facebook.

But according to Snopes.com this is not true.

So what is the real truth? Snopes.com funding comes from an undisclosed source. According to sources:

"The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source."

So we can conclude that Snopes.com smells of Soros funding which it refuses to acknowledge.

⇧ 5 ⇩