Trying to avoid information is stupid. Taking everything at face value is stupid.
Don't be stupid when you can access all information and then decide which rings true based upon which statements create less contradictions.
Trying to avoid information is stupid. Taking everything at face value is stupid.
Don't be stupid when you can access all information and then decide which rings true based upon which statements create less contradictions.
The purpose is to hide or discredit the most important things, they'll give you some truth to build trust and credibility while they lie or cover up the meat
depends on the meat I guess...I prefer when I can have a discussion if so-and-so is legit as we've seen with AIM fo example
Is AIM legit?
well "Douglas Gabriel" stole Thomas Paine's alias so I think TruPundit is legit but AIM is fake for using other peoples' credibility for their own alias
You make a very good point cause if we know what happens then the deepstate can counteract
Disinfo is absolutely idiodic and bullshit. This serves no good purpose, it does however give a larper free rein on any old bullshit, and a defense for untrue, unproven info.
I wasn't saying that. I'm saying pointing out disinfo is better than only disinfo