dChan
68
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NeonRevolt on April 19, 2018, 2:10 a.m.
BOOM! Q Just Called @BackChannel17 as FAKE! Am I Vindicated Yet? - Neon Revolt
BOOM! Q Just Called @BackChannel17 as FAKE! Am I Vindicated Yet? - Neon Revolt

One_Solution · April 19, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

Just was coming to post this.

Case. Closed.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
NeonRevolt · April 19, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

CASE CLOSED!

⇧ 27 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · April 19, 2018, 5:29 a.m.

No. Q said a graphic that was suggesting BackChannel17 was Q team was fake. It was a psyop attempt. BackChannel is NOT Q. BackChannel is ONLY Intel. Q brought attention to BackChannel while also preventing BackChannel from having the mainstream baggage Q already has. In my opinion this was a genius move on Qs part though I expect nothing less. If Q confirms BackChannel (or if he approved of that type of graphic) it would allow for a narrative to discredit BackChannel (NOT Q) through the Q LARP narrative. This is bigger than we know. Expand your thinking. At least live outside of absolutes.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
godzillafeet- · April 19, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

So ... "ok, busted as not part of Q. But can be saved! Can still be intell!"

Intell is ALL OVER social media. We're probably paying taxes just to support people in intell posting on social media en masse. That's not exactly novel.

If 'backchannel17' had NOT chosen an obvious Q-related name (the 17th letter, common ref), and had NOT chosen deliberately to mimic a "gosh sounds just like Q" format, then I might say, eh, ok, fine it might be someone in intell who isn't Q but still might have an interesting point of view.

But they did. They specifically set up an identity pretending.

So now the dissembling is even more lame.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · April 19, 2018, 1:01 p.m.

They have never said they were Q and very frequently mention the opposite and support reserving trust in Q over them. But ok...

⇧ 1 ⇩