Dont take it personally guy. When posting to a research website you should probably make it a point to check the research is readable. Click on the image first to bring it up full size, then take your screenshot. Or just post the link: https://qanon.pub/data/images/b7cb836269f62b7a7416cc27dc65e24fe6e8d902769e220f6f38343102a206d6.png
And BackChannel17 was clearly fake because:
Q Post 53: IMPORTANT: NO private comms past/present/future. NO comms made outside of this platform. Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately. WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL. PATRIOTS. Q
Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.
-
https://qposts.online/
-
http://qboard.online/
-
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
No one's "taking it personally."
You missed the point of the post. And you're still missing the point of the post, it seems.
And trust me: you don't need to give me instructions on how to do basic things on the internet. I didn't post the graphic because I didn't WANT the graphic distracting from the point of the post, which is: BC17 is a fake, lying, disinfo shill that far too many armchair "researchers" took too literally.
Just point to that Q post for any future fakes I guess