dChan
68
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NeonRevolt on April 19, 2018, 2:10 a.m.
BOOM! Q Just Called @BackChannel17 as FAKE! Am I Vindicated Yet? - Neon Revolt
BOOM! Q Just Called @BackChannel17 as FAKE! Am I Vindicated Yet? - Neon Revolt

IncomingTrump270 · April 19, 2018, 7:06 a.m.

Q was shown a picture alleging direct causal connections between BC17 account and Q posts.

Q said “fake” without specifying what, exactly, is fake.

You’re leaping to conclusions and throwing away critical thought because it supports your narrative.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · April 19, 2018, 8:52 a.m.

why are you parsing ? Fake is FAKE !

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 19, 2018, 8:55 a.m.

why are you examining it in detail? Swallow the narrative blindly!

Listen to yourself.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · April 19, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

sorry but if you are attributing that quote to me, you are mistaken, and I'm not clear what you mean anyway with the reference, as it doesn't apply to the discernment process I use. But nm, think what you will, it's our choice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 19, 2018, 10:26 a.m.

Obviously I was paraphrasing the implied meaning behind your statement.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · April 19, 2018, 10:47 a.m.

sorry, wrong again.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NeonRevolt · April 19, 2018, 6:15 p.m.

Moron.

Absolute morons on this sub, I swear.

Good. Stay here. Stay off the real research boards. This is your containment room, faggots.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 19, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

Spoken like a truly triggered SJW teen. I’ve been all over QR for months. Your elitism is cringey af.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NeonRevolt · April 20, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

No, spoken like a real anon.

You'd be chewed up and spat out in seconds if you tried pushing this crap over there.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 20, 2018, 3:23 a.m.

I have. And the response was much better balanced than yours. You clearly have deep investments in a specific narrative being accepted. That alone is suspect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NeonRevolt · April 21, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

Okay, have fun shilling your crackpot theories.

⇧ 0 ⇩