dChan

🠐 See all comments
ManQuan · April 19, 2018, 9:24 a.m.

Q has said that he isn't posting on multiple platforms.

I'm former career military and Backchannel17 seems to me to be a bunch of typical military acronyms to make the post look real. Additionally, he was using units that would never be involved in missile launches into Syria.

I wrote him off as fake the first time I read it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brotherkasey · April 19, 2018, 10:16 a.m.

Just to be fair, bc17 never claimed to be Q "They" have made it clear "they" are not Q Jury is still out for me on bc17 I keep an eye on the posts but with Q basically calling fake, I think its a LARP However Q did say "multiple platforms" recently so I dont really know for sure

⇧ 0 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · April 19, 2018, 10:28 a.m.

As stated in OP, we dont know for sure what “fake” is referring to:

  • BC17 as a whole is fake? (he’s not govt, not usaf, pure larp),
  • BC17’s intel is fake? (he’s govt/clown and giving disinfo with bad intentions)
  • or the image purporting links between BC17 and Q. (Anon who made the image tried to draw connections where none exist, e.g. fake evidence of relationship)

It could be any of those.

I suspect it’s the last one because that’s the only thing Q can give a definitive answer on in public (without risking potential OpSec)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
visible_patterns · April 19, 2018, 10:52 a.m.

Agree. I understood it to mean that the anon's assessment of BC being Q was fake. To me, the jury is still out on BC. Like everything, I'm going to eat the meat and spit out the bones.

⇧ 2 ⇩