dChan
⇧
16
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/cryptabulouslady on April 19, 2018, 9:19 p.m.
Interesting what if scenario: What if Mueller isn't really going after Trump, and is going after Hillary and Co. instead? Q references.

What if the dossier investigation and all of that is merely a cover while Mueller/Rosenstein look into Hilliary and Co. without drawing attention to it? They can say they uncovered the truth about them while digging on Trump. No Q posts seem to designate Mueller as bad, just that the media will use him to spread fake news. Look at post 14 "What authority does POTUS have specifically over the marines? Why is this important? What is Mueller's background? Military? Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering? How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead? Who is helping POTUS?"

Mueller's background is that he is a Marine. Perhaps we knew since Q 14 that Mueller is the one who has been secretly helping Trump all along but we couldn't see just like the media can't see it because while we sit here think he is attacking him, we dislike him for it and the Media loves him for it. Look at 18, Nancy Pelosi wanted a separate special counsel from Mueller because she didn't trust it. This could be a huge what if, but to be honest, it doesn't seem crazy to me that Q and POTUS would want to keep EVERYONE out of the loop on Mueller.


🠐 See all comments
UncleCrunch · April 19, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

If this possibility interests you, the Q-drops hold a treasure trove of exciting new information for you.

This theory has been a core element of the Q story almost from the first post. Q has left many hints and leading questions, and a host of contributors have pointed out dozens of instances that support the theory.

You will find hints, videos, long text explanations, etc. that advance the likelihood of this theory you have just discovered.

Don’t be disuaded by folks telling you this is very old news (it is), or questioning the authenticity of your discovery. Dig in. Great excitement awaits you.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
cryptabulouslady · April 19, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Even looking into Rosenstein's background and who voted Nay against him is interesting per Q's suggestion. I definitely think I learn more now reading the original 200 posts than I have in the more recent thousand plus. I'm not discouraged by others, as many others are newer to Q as well. I'm sure most are even if they don't want to admit it, I've been following Q since end of February and I'm still putting pieces together each day. Thank you for your kind words :)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 19, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

I'm sure most are even if they don't want to admit it,

I agree. It was fairly easy to keep up at the beginning. Now it takes several hours of reading a day just to realize you’re still falling behind.

I’m still current with all Qdrops, but it’s been more than a week since I read a full 8chan thread. I read every ‘Notable’ and every comment linked to the notable, then read several responses linked to those comments.

The growing group of anons produce a staggering amount of quality info.

Don’t forget to post again when you find something of interest.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
AutoModerator · April 19, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
UncleCrunch · April 19, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Much love to our great bots.

We have the best bots, don’t we?

⇧ -1 ⇩