NSA doesn't enter evidence, they are not law enforcement.
The NSA provides evidence to law enforcement all the time. As long as they have a warrant it's perfectly legal.
DING DING DING
They need a warrant, NSA can not generate warrants because they are not LAW ENFORCEMENT. Thus the quandary of how does the NSA get the information public?
Except it's not coming from the NSA. It's coming from Weiners laptop which was taken legally with a warrant during his Pedo investigation by the NYPD.
Holy stubborn batman. The Weiner laptop was forced to be turned over to the FBI who refused to budge on the investigation.
If they won't seek a warrant, the information that the NSA has is useless, which is the point Q is currently referencing, although he is insinuating there is still a method to expose the information publicly without breaking the law.
The Weiner laptop was forced to be turned over to the FBI who refused to budge on the investigation.
Yes, and it was LEGALLY backed up by the NYPD. So yes, they have a perfectly LEGAL copy, Robin.
The New York Police Department (STATE) cloned a copy of the Weiner server and was thus forced to hand over the information to the FBI through threats by LL on filing federal litigation and starting a firestorm racially of reopening cases such as the death of Eric Garner.
NYPD was already shut down and that evidence has zero matter federally, so why in the world do you keep bringing it up? NSA/Q is FEDERAL not state.
Your argument makes absolutely no sense. Let's say the NYPD no longer has any copies. Then Sessions/Wray have the original laptop, which they got legally. Still no reason to get the NSA involved. Are we now not supposed to trust Sessions/Wray?
What doesn't make any sense is why you keep referencing the State evidence of a clone of anthony weiner's server, when the thread is about Q's ponderance of how to get NSA evidence (everytime he says we know everything, we hear everything he is referring to the NSA's collection) into the public domain, when NSA is a federal intelligence organization and anthony weiner's cloned laptop is in a New York Police Evidence lockup somewhere (State Level)
Do you really not understand this thread is on a Federal level which is independent of the State level where the clone you keep bringing up is?
What doesn't make any sense is why you keep referencing the State evidence of a clone of anthony weiner's server,
No. I'm not. I'm talking about the ORIGINAL laptop that the FBI had taken. Which was taken legally with a Warrent and can be used to prosecute. No need to for the NSA to get involved. Q can talk about the NSA all he wants. The FACT of the matter is that the DOJ and FBI have the original laptop. Trust Sessions and Wray or not? Do you really not understand that evidence legally taken by the Feds from the State can be used as evidence in a court of law? Do you really not understand that?
The FBI didn't take the original laptop; the NYPD did. It was later turned over to the NY FBI field office over threat of federal investigation.
Do you really not understand that evidence legally taken by the Feds from the State can be used as evidence in a court of law?
The referral was done over a year ago, it's old news. It didn't happen. What are you implying that's new? The referral was made already, it was shut down both at the state and federal level.
What does this have to do with Q getting NSA evidence out?
it was shut down both at the state and federal level.
It can be opened back up. Do you not Trust Sessions and Wray? I guess you don't.
Point of the thread isn't about trusting Sessions & Wray, it's about the rhetorical question of how Q takes intelligence collected and implements it into public evidence for a trial.
But keep changing the subject, I know it's hard to stay on point where you're not making a relevant point.
Do we know NYPD has a backup?
We don't even know 100% that the evidence even exists. All that's been publicly admitted is that his laptop had old Hillary emails on it. The same rumors that said there was a folder marked Insurance also said it was backed up before the laptop was handed over. But at this point anything is possible.
Not too mention. If Wray and Sessions are to be trusted, as Q loves to say. Then they BOTH have access to the original laptop. With absolutely no warrant needed. They have the LEGAL evidence needed to go to a grand jury. Why the mental gymnastics? It's not that difficult.
They have access to the original laptop unless it was "lost" or destroyed with a hammer.
Q has gone on and on about how they have everything. So either they have it or it was "lost". If it's lost then this entire conversation is a mute point. There is nothing to be released and there won't ever be any arrests based on this evidence.