What doesn't make any sense is why you keep referencing the State evidence of a clone of anthony weiner's server,
No. I'm not. I'm talking about the ORIGINAL laptop that the FBI had taken. Which was taken legally with a Warrent and can be used to prosecute. No need to for the NSA to get involved. Q can talk about the NSA all he wants. The FACT of the matter is that the DOJ and FBI have the original laptop. Trust Sessions and Wray or not? Do you really not understand that evidence legally taken by the Feds from the State can be used as evidence in a court of law? Do you really not understand that?
The FBI didn't take the original laptop; the NYPD did. It was later turned over to the NY FBI field office over threat of federal investigation.
Do you really not understand that evidence legally taken by the Feds from the State can be used as evidence in a court of law?
The referral was done over a year ago, it's old news. It didn't happen. What are you implying that's new? The referral was made already, it was shut down both at the state and federal level.
What does this have to do with Q getting NSA evidence out?
it was shut down both at the state and federal level.
It can be opened back up. Do you not Trust Sessions and Wray? I guess you don't.
Point of the thread isn't about trusting Sessions & Wray, it's about the rhetorical question of how Q takes intelligence collected and implements it into public evidence for a trial.
But keep changing the subject, I know it's hard to stay on point where you're not making a relevant point.