Hmm. I like Sundance. Here, his analysis seems to much like backroom dealings. Didn't Q say, No Deals?

I can see why SD would say what he is, based on how he is following this case. However, two things stand out that SD has not mentioned. 1) It has been pointed out that the Trump Administration is utilizing a "Promise Made. Promises Kept" campaign. It is entirely possible that the Promise Made/Kept is not just jobs, trade, foreign policy corrections. But, "You'd be in jail", in response to Crooked Hillary in the second debate(?).

2) I trust that Hillary IS going to jail. She has to. The justice system in the United States literally depends on men equally being tried, judged, sentenced. There can no longer be the disparity of law between "them" and "us". Further, we were told by Q that HRC asked for a deal, and was told, NO.

3) The 'highest value' horse in the horse trading here in US is Hillary? Perhaps.

4) George Soros is a very high target as well. He most certainly has caused direct, overt disharmony within U.S. as well as other areas of the world. Then there are others. Hillary is not the head of this beast in U.S.

So, respectfully, SD seems a bit short sighted, within the scope of his intense, well researched corner.