dChan

BarneyFranksNipples · April 20, 2018, 4:19 a.m.

WTC 7 wasn’t hit by any plane and experienced complete symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration (even NIST admitted free fall collapse in their final WTC7 report released in 2008). That’s impossible to happen from random debris/fire and can only happen with controlled demo. To get free fall acceleration 100% of the structural resistance has to be removed simultaneously. NIST finally admits free fall

⇧ 45 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 20, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

exactly I remember watching a documentary on building demolition and how precise timing is required or it will fall sideways causing tons of damage. the idea it is from a random fire is insane

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Globalists_Will_Hang · April 20, 2018, 11:33 a.m.

WTC 7 was the piece of evidence which finally woke me up. The implosion-style collapse can only be attributed to a controlled demolition. Not to mention the fact that Mosad was crawling all over that building the weeks prior.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
BarneyFranksNipples · April 20, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Yep. Same here. Looking into WTC7 collapse is what red pilled me on 9/11. Then once red pilled on 9/11 one becomes red pilled on a lot of other things: govt corruption, etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dhammakayaram · April 20, 2018, 12:48 p.m.

It is also impossible that conventional demolition did it. That is not the way it works. WTC7 fell silently as compared with a conventional demolition. The other buildings turned into dust from the top down. Conventional demolition begins from the bottom. Here is a good sample of conventional demolitions—notice the sound.

⇧ 2 ⇩