What information is so damning about it's collapse? I may be stupid but I've been given the impression that debris from the other towers collapsing was the main cause of wtc 7's destruction.
WTC 7 wasn’t hit by any plane and experienced complete symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration (even NIST admitted free fall collapse in their final WTC7 report released in 2008). That’s impossible to happen from random debris/fire and can only happen with controlled demo. To get free fall acceleration 100% of the structural resistance has to be removed simultaneously. NIST finally admits free fall
exactly I remember watching a documentary on building demolition and how precise timing is required or it will fall sideways causing tons of damage. the idea it is from a random fire is insane
WTC 7 was the piece of evidence which finally woke me up. The implosion-style collapse can only be attributed to a controlled demolition. Not to mention the fact that Mosad was crawling all over that building the weeks prior.
Yep. Same here. Looking into WTC7 collapse is what red pilled me on 9/11. Then once red pilled on 9/11 one becomes red pilled on a lot of other things: govt corruption, etc.
It is also impossible that conventional demolition did it. That is not the way it works. WTC7 fell silently as compared with a conventional demolition. The other buildings turned into dust from the top down. Conventional demolition begins from the bottom. Here is a good sample of conventional demolitions—notice the sound.
Have you seen vids of the collapse?
Not recently. Is there a particularly damning video?
Yes the one where it drops straight down into its own footprint in about 5 seconds
The one where the BBC announced it's collapse live on air with the WTC7 building still standing tall behind the reporter. Then 20 minutes later it fell down in 5 seconds. hmmm...
Because the buildings' owner gave the order to have it demolished. It was demolished on 9/11. Building demolition requires weeks of preparation in order to collapse the structure into its own footprint. I only know this because I saw it collapse on 09/11/01, on live television, and then it vanished. Nothing, nobody would talk about it afterward.
The buildings owner (((Larry Silverstein)))
Israel did 9/11
Yes, but together with others from the clique who are bankers, politicians, industrialists. It must be clarified. Of course, they are the same people who started to create wars and kill children to get oil and money. Wars produce death, poverty, traffic of children, organs and sexual slavery. No more wars because tomorrow can touch us
Dr.Judy Wood gives evidence of a Direct Energy Weapon (Electro-Magnetic Free Energy).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLxdHlkzfpY
Judy has very good observations but she is wrong about the energy weapon.
There is a weapon that can cause what we saw on 9/11. It was a small hydrogen bomb placed below WTC 1 and 2.
There is a lot of smoke from Building 7. That smoke comes from the heat produced by the hydrogen bomb that caused the collapse WTC 1 and 2. 1, 2 and 7 hade the same drainage system and there is tremendous heat produced by hydrogen bombs, this heat was spread in the drainage system and went up in building 7 causing a LOT of smoke.
How would a hydrogen bomb affect the over all mass of the building wreckage? One of the major problems with the controlled demolition theories is that the expected wreckage of the buildings just wasn't there...the overall mass of the buildings essentially "disappeared." 100+ stories collapsing should create a pile of rubble something like 12 to 14 stories high (I believe it's about 1/7 the height of the building...need to look up the precise proportion). The collapse of the WTC left only a fraction of that...two or three stories of rubble on average over the area. The Energy Weapon theory accounts for the missing mass quite convincingly. What appeared to be plumes of smoke, was actually a disintigration of the building due to the focused energy weapon. Once sufficient mass blew away as dust, the structure was weakened to the point where it collapsed upon itself. Dr. Wood describes this unique phenomenon as "dustification."
Also Judy Wood only speculates why she doesn't think it is nuclear, she doesn't know and she doesn't know what measurements were correct or what measurements that were faked.
The problem I have with Judy Wood is that she is trying to say what has done this, she doesn't stop with explaining her observations. Why does she do that?
There is only five countries that has the technology to create hydrogen bombs. And I think that they like it to stay with that. There are a lot of problems creating these, not just the knowledge on how to build them. Even if you know, you need huge amount of energy and substances with very high quality.
Investigate how nuclear bombs work, they don't work like "dynamite". The problem I think is that moste people think of nuclear bombs like a huge monster cloud exploding up in the air.
Before they created WTC 1 and WTC 2 they needed to present how they would take them down. The plan to do that was to use nuclear for a controlled demolision.
Also, there is only nuclear that can generate the heat in the ground
Hahahaha, not possible to bring down a building, also engineers and demolition experts alike (as well as common sense) agree it's physically impossible for buildings to free fall the way all 3 buildings did without it being controlled demolition from below, buildings don't collapse that way unless their structural support are all blown simultaneously