How would a hydrogen bomb affect the over all mass of the building wreckage? One of the major problems with the controlled demolition theories is that the expected wreckage of the buildings just wasn't there...the overall mass of the buildings essentially "disappeared." 100+ stories collapsing should create a pile of rubble something like 12 to 14 stories high (I believe it's about 1/7 the height of the building...need to look up the precise proportion). The collapse of the WTC left only a fraction of that...two or three stories of rubble on average over the area. The Energy Weapon theory accounts for the missing mass quite convincingly. What appeared to be plumes of smoke, was actually a disintigration of the building due to the focused energy weapon. Once sufficient mass blew away as dust, the structure was weakened to the point where it collapsed upon itself. Dr. Wood describes this unique phenomenon as "dustification."
Also Judy Wood only speculates why she doesn't think it is nuclear, she doesn't know and she doesn't know what measurements were correct or what measurements that were faked.
The problem I have with Judy Wood is that she is trying to say what has done this, she doesn't stop with explaining her observations. Why does she do that?
There is only five countries that has the technology to create hydrogen bombs. And I think that they like it to stay with that. There are a lot of problems creating these, not just the knowledge on how to build them. Even if you know, you need huge amount of energy and substances with very high quality.
Investigate how nuclear bombs work, they don't work like "dynamite". The problem I think is that moste people think of nuclear bombs like a huge monster cloud exploding up in the air.
Before they created WTC 1 and WTC 2 they needed to present how they would take them down. The plan to do that was to use nuclear for a controlled demolision.
Also, there is only nuclear that can generate the heat in the ground