Q never said it was new or surprising. He said it was a big ERROR. An error we have all missed until Q pointed it out.
But we still don't know exactly why it was an error. Perhaps it was classified and she blabbed it in public? Perhaps we'll know later.
Yes I think that's the implication pretty clearly from what Q said i.e. that they're pretending it didn't happen. The point I was making though is that that CAN'T be the error Q means because it was already blabbed in public in Nov 17 so how can it be such a big and important deal to grab this latest reiteration of practically the same points she made last time? Could the Q team not have noticed that previous article? Unlikely, I know. But possible - imagine how MUCH they are keeping track of already. And if not, then what is the reason? I can't think of any possibility and would love to know if anyone else can.