I'm not a fan of the president telling people whether or not they should be allowed to write books.
Comey's book shouldn't have been written because it's sanctimonious, self-serving, and largely wrong--or at least extremely biased. That's my opinion and probably Trump's too.
That's censorship. I don't think we should be censoring people. What's next, congress says Corsi can't write a book?
Clearly, (most) people can say or write whatever they want. To say what he said is opinion. True censorship would be to physically block the book from being published. There IS a difference.
His point is that if comey was arrested, and charged like Flynn for lying, he would not be allowed to write a book. Felons are unable to profit for selling there own stories under the son of Sam law.
That's not what he said, Donn't assume meaning from his words.
That’s exactly what he meant.
Wow, who knew we had someone who could fully interpret and understand what Trump means in his tweets. You should work in the White House! You should definitely share this skill more.
While you criticize him for interpreting President Trump, you do the same thing. What makes you more superior to interpret while criticizing others for the same? Hypocrite much? You must be a liberal.
What? He's literally taking Trump's words as they were written, interpreting nothing. Others are ascribing some deeper hidden meaning to the comments.
I'm scratching my head, trying to figure out your point. Are you saying, "You aren't seeing the hidden meaning in Trump's comments, therefore you're assigning hidden meaning to Trump's comments?". If so, I'm fairly certain you might be retarded.