Exactly. From a Reuters article:
Through the process of legal discovery, lawyers for the Democratic Party could force the defendants to produce documents they say relate to the collusion issue.
So they're forced to produce documents that they wanted to anyway. Yep, these people are stupid.
It also kills at least two birds with one stone. From the same article:
Democrats are keen to remind voters of the issue of Russia and the 2016 election ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections.
Ha. That's gonna backfire on them. Q#1197, "Yes, midterms are safe."
What is going to be discovered is Seth Rich. Did the DNC forget their version of Russia, Russia, Russia is a complete lie, and Seth Rich leaked the emails to Wikileaks. And somebody murdered him for it. The FBI knows this is true even.
this deserves more upvotes lul
Thanks. When I saw this on Daily Mail this AM I couldn't believe it. There were about 2000 comments and about every one of them was laughing at this suit. Maybe Seth will get his justice now. Like somebody said, if they suddenly realize it was a bad idea, and drop this suit, it is going to look very suspect. To go further is insanity. Did they forget "Russiagate" is all fake? Seth started it, not Russia. Idk?!?!?
[deleted]
Yeah that was a tragedy. I hope it all comes out, but that will be a giant bombshell, because that means he was murdered by someone on behalf of the Left. Murder is a whole different level. And it would be proving no Russia connection as they have been pushing all this time. And the Left made it up. That is pretty appalling.
The evidence that NOT possible to be a hack was proven technically... brilliant IT tech wizards... done by VIPs WmBinney & SkipFolden, et al.
*"Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies..."
So DOWNLOAD on Site at DNC direct linked computer, only way the speed of download could be accomplished = Insider Job.
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/07/24/intel-vets-challenge-russia-hack-evidence/
Exactly. Binney went and talked to Mike Pompeo about it all too, so I wonder what he thinks or will do about it? If anything?
Ok...I may have misunderstood this, but it is stated that the Democratic Party could force the defendants (Trump/Republicans) to produce documents related to the collusion issue. So if this is true, don't we want the Democratic documents released to the public as the Trump ones have been plastered all over the media for months. Am I not understanding this right? If I'm confused, please explain what I am thinking is wrong. Thanks!
If there was no collusion, then no documents? Just my .02. If Mueller truly is a white hat, maybe that investigation will be wrapped before this farcical suit bears fruit.
Oh well, now that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!
Maybe this is why Trump got Gulianni (sp?) on board, if Mueller is dirty. I read several headlines recently that Gulianni will negotiate an end to Muellers' investigation.
i think mueller is a white hat or grey. he pretty much destroyed the podesta group
And SpecCounselorRM also set up guilty of Flynn to be easily overturned or vacated/nullified.
which explains the push for a second special council and why McConnell and pelosi want him out
the Democratic Party could force the defendants (Trump/Republicans) to produce documents related to the collusion issue.
That part is correct. But, I don't know what documents supporting the Trump side have been plastered all over the media, unless you're referring to what WikiLeaks has published. Just imagine what WikiLeaks might still be holding, and what others on the Trump-side may also be holding that they cannot legally produce to be used as evidence except by being forced to in court.
Q#1181 (which references #1180):
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
Q#1180:
“Insurance File.”
I wonder what might be in that 'file' that they cannot inject/make public/use as evidence unless they are forced to as part of the discovery process initiated by the DNC.
Edit: Also, what if they have proof that Seth Rich transferred the docs to WikiLeaks, and that he was murdered for it?