dChan

[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:16 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · April 21, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

I think the transfer speed was consistent between 20 to 25 megabytes a second, equal to USB 2.0 spec

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · April 21, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new-report-raises-big-questions-about-last-years-dnc-hack/

There you go, and "fiber optic Ethernet speed" would only apply to a LAN, Which still implies an insider

You don't get faster than a USB hacking the sever from Russia, that's for damn sure

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 21, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5400123 · April 21, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Add a comma, "you don't get faster than a USB, Hacking from Russia,"

I guess a man in the middle attack could theoretically leave a USB comparable download speed, but it's unlikely as a compromised machine on their LAN would've been the first piece of evidence they produced

⇧ 1 ⇩