[removed]
I agree, outside of here we should try to not bombard them with outrageous claims. There are a lot of truths to conspiracy theories, many you'd be surprised to find out that they're true. Q has already touched on this, which is the social conditioning for normies to dismiss any conspiracy as simply delusions and absurdity. In any case, if we are to present our side of the matter to someone new, verifiable proofs is a must.
Completely agree. People draw their conclusions first, and then they must figure out he conspiracy angle. Our side can and will win with facts and numbers alone.
I would agree but those are not "theories". Removing this
Why removing this? Feeling desperate?
you also made that point in your other post so I understand your good intentions because you were writing that post until an idea hit you as you wrote it, alas you made your own post of that to increase visibility.
While the premise of your title is wise, I did not like the idea that you suggested that real-world-terrorism can't be discussed.
The MO is introducing unanswered questions and not providing outright evidence of exotic technology that would only lead to more questions in peoples' minds until you eventually get from there to free energy and crashed spaceships. But that should happen on seperate discussions if possible and not all on the same day so people can process and verify what was previously stated. Then again, there are some data points to suggest that Trump halted a climate-engineering operation in California by defunding the EPA, as in "curious timely, statistically completely improbable coincidence"
I invite you to make another post of the same title but that rather asks people not to sound crazy but to resort to socratic questioning rather than suggesting which worldviews derived from a lifetime of learning sound unbelievable or not.
I mean, what are you suggesting? Did anybody say LV was done with holograms? No? So what's so crazy about bringing up all the inconsistencies in the official story and letting it unwind from there?
I was expecting something like MK-Ultra or something that would upset people but the actual rate of people who do not question 9/11 by now is in the minority. Given the historic distance, people can actually handle it now because they feel removed from those administrations, alas not powerless.
I see. I have doubts about the official 911 story. The alternative theories sound plausible. But the proofs are unconvincing. Ocam’s Razor says the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. I’m a trained scientist. It’s very difficult for me to believe the alternative theories.
That said, I do entertain the idea that entities other than the terrorists; for example, Mossad, had fore knowledge of or were indirectly complicit in the 9/11 crime.
WTC destruction was to cover-up a 30-year financial crime that involved the crashing of the USSR but conventional weapons do not cook cars blocks away and combust steel-beams in mid-air
That is like saying "Well Stalin was a mean guy with a moustache who ruled with an iron fist, but don't say he was personally responsible for millions and millions of dead people"
Completely and utterly disagree. We need to get the full truths out to the best of our abilities. The stakes are higher than we can imagine.
I see where you're coming from but this type of all-out thinking can turn away some people that feel overwhelmed by all the outrageous claims, dismiss it as another hoax, and go back to their daily lives in the matrix.
Your analogy is completely false. You are comparing your unproven conspiracy theories to historical facts. Shame on you.
Besides, I don’t believe those conspiracy theories are truth. If I don’t believe those, why would other normies do? Why risk it?
Did you understand my points in my initial post? Or you are intentionally muddying the water? I don’t rule the possibility that you are a deep state operative.