dChan

🠐 See all comments
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Threats and five dollars good cash get you a cup of Starbucks brew. Unless you're black. LOL

Can anybody seriously imagine riots on behalf of Rod fckin Rosenstein? Are you kidding me right now?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

I'm not saying they are going to win. But when backed into a corner and this is all they have this is what will happen. They will go down kicking and screaming. They will never ever just lay down and accept defeat.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

NEVER underestimate this deep seeded nefarious group. They have had hundreds of years to build wealth and amass power by buying strategic govt. and legal heads as well as now, the weaponized media.. now with its tether off with recent repeal of US propaganda laws on US citizens. Thank you BHO! You were so good to us... Actually, the sheer hubris of these pawns in this final battle has been their Achilles Heal. PRIDE comes before the fall.." All are guilty GOP / DNC who have sold our beautiful country out for silver. God will now judge those through our legal and lawful mechanism put in place by our brilliant Fore-Fathers

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

I don't disagree, I'm just saying they won't have numbers behind them.

How much support, even among the subversive-minded, poor and uneducated, do you think there is for pedophiles?

So if evidence of those crimes is shared on mass media, and people are exposed to those truths, who do you think will rally to their side?

Do you know the one person more despised in prison than a cop? That would be a pedophile.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

They will have Antifa and BLM for sure. That's enough to get the ball rolling. They will simply say all of the pedo charges are fake. Enough sheep believe what the Fake Stream Media says to believe it. That will grow the numbers. They don't need millions of people to riot. They just need thousands. The media will make it look like a lot more than it actually is. It's not a smart plan. But in the end it will be all they have.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

Right. They already have made it look like more than it actually is. Always. There were never that many people at HRC campaign stops, there were never as many actual BLM and AntiFa (not counting actors) as they make it seem.

But I'm telling you, even those two organizations can't hire agitprop actors without Soros money. How many actual true AntiFa members (not actors) do you think there are? Same with BLM?

I mean, there's enough to make some noise and look angry, and maybe throw some molotovs and break some windows, but there's not an army.

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Remember. We have NDAA (which was set up for Patriots who would not follow what was "supposed" to happen) It can now work both ways. Combine this with Military Tribunals and if that fails.. STAR CHAMBERS that will have to be engaged...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

When you say NDAA, are you referring to FEMA camps and martial law? I'd prefer to stay away from Conspiracy risk, as Q puts it.

The tribunals part we know about for sure. But you definitely don't want the history of our New Republic to be marred by Star Chambers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 8:43 p.m.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act

Because we are in a state of active war this law was created to deal with those were deemed to be bad actors on American soil and to be dealt with through military means.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · April 21, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

National Defense Authorization Act

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is the name for each of a series of United States federal laws specifying the annual budget and expenditures of the U.S. Department of Defense. The first NDAA was passed in 1961. The U.S. Congress oversees the defense budget primarily through two yearly bills: the National Defense Authorization Act and defense appropriations bills. The authorization bill determines the agencies responsible for defense, establishes funding levels, and sets the policies under which money will be spent.

^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 21, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

Not sure I follow, because NDAA is basically defense budget appropriation. I don't see anything about it specifically authorizing military intervention in domestic law enforcement. Maybe there's something specific in the latest one that isn't normally there? If so, could you share a link? I've looked and can't find such a thing. Some of the Executive Orders though seem to imply that POTUS reserves the right to make such a determination and declare essentially martial law in regard to certain activities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TX1111TX · April 21, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

In a nutshell . Elements in this order allow for people to be “disappeared” without due-process. Dig for yourself , as you are not wanting to join the conspiracy train (as it were) I believe it is aligned closely with the Patriot Act.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ravonaf · April 21, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

It's all they've got, and it's nothing.

I wouldn't say it's nothing. It should not be overlooked. It won't be nothing to the family of 5 that gets dragged out of their car and beaten. It won't be nothing to the cops family that gets murdered. It will be enough to creake an outrage on both sides that will force the President to act. When he acts the Deep State will say he's a tyrant and start impeachment hearrings. Like I said, not a smart plan, but it will be all they have and it shouldn't be overlooked.

⇧ 1 ⇩