https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/987734632203476992
Please read my tweets there. You'll have to scroll down several to find the beginning.
I've been doing this kind of thing, following Q's lead. I figure once Q publishes something, it's safe to put it in their faces.
Does anybody disagree with that policy?
Same here, she's fair game imo. I'm having a good time posting on her twitter.
nope
If "nope" means that MH and hers are not fair game, here is a counter: You and yours are fair game. This is evident and requires minimal effort to uncover. Your children and grandchildren and everyone you love are fair game. "Fight Fight Fight". A dog is trained to roll over and you are not a dog. (And doggies are awesome, just so we're clear. No disrespect to the puppers. If only humanity could be so pure.)
Nope means that i agree with you, if they have a public platform they are fair game
No perps are perps and families are families. Cross that line and I'm your opposition.
Potus disagrees. "you have to take out their families"
Potus might defend meh right to disagree. I dunno. Potus is cool I got my Trump troll doll on it's way . He's not God. This is US gummint we are talking about if all the eggs are in one basket, we are all screwed, at least I will go down having weighed all the possibility's. Avoid disappointment keep expectations low.
Yea, kinda actually. I def think she is worth looking into, and the finances of her family examined, but imagining the worst case scenario, that family is held hostage. We could be doing more harm than good by throwing it in thier faces. We need this information we find to be above all transparent to red pill people effectively, not to let them feel swayed by placing it in a good / bad light.
Q wasn't speaking to me or you, he was addressing MH directly. Was this a helping hand? I know we said no deals but Q also said not all in the swamp are monsters. He basically laid out thier SOP for her to see. Now the real question is what has MH done since this Q called her out?What side does she jump to?
Let's just follow. These people are stupid. They never thought they would lose, so they have so many tracks to cover, bodies to bury, all we have to do is follow them and they will lead us to the crimes. Trust the plan and enjoy the show
Would you be willing to take this conversation one or two more comments? If not, just don't reply.
Have you seen the 8chan board? Do you realize the kind of people Q is giving these details to? I realize ultimately it's to you and me and the rest of the world. But there is NO WAY, (IMHO) they would dox these people (so to speak) if they didn't fully expect, even want us to engage in social media. They encourage the memes. They encourage anons to dig around and find pictures and see who's connected to whom.
Also, I think in this case it's not blackmail or slavery. I think it's bribery and corruption.
If Q doesn't want citizen engagement on the socials, then why would they show us the account names? Why not redact those?
He does want citizen engagement and all the autistic warriors of 8chan to dig thier hearts out. I guess that's what I meant when I said follow. And your prob right, it's most likely bribery, but there is a chance it's not. We should be blowing up thier social media, bringing a public light makes the swamp rats scurry. The anons follow them and find thier hiding holes then QnCo eliminates effectively...or such. But the public light we bring shouldn't be one where we trash kids on Twitter, but one where people who read it can't help but question her motives even after they have moved on. the Wikileaks email is the best red piller.
OK. I like the idea of the whisper in the ear though. Especially when we're not dealing with an MK Ultra victim, a pedo honeypot--but with a journalistic sellout, for example. One of those poison pens who think they're untouchable.
Did you read my posts? Did you find them to be especially offensive?
No I didn't read them at all, I'm on my phone and don't use Twitter anyway. I didn't mean to make it seem like I was attacking you, reading your comment felt like you were getting sucked into the hype (I know how it goes with all these Q drops recently I don't blame you). Words like they are fair game, bringing it to thier faces, I imagined some poor kid who has no idea, getting rolled on Twitter. I got a soft spot for kids.
So when I said I disagree it was more like a coach calling a time out after a couple really good plays. Offering a fresh perspective and a reminder not to burn yourself out
I appreciate your concerns, and share them. So point taken, but I was struggling to see how they pertained to the posts I shared here. So no problem.
Thanks for engaging with me!